Department of Endocrinology, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2010 Feb;11(1):12-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2009.00536.x. Epub 2009 Jul 6.
To compare low dose (0.05 units/kg/h) with standard dose (0.1 units/kg/h) intravenous insulin infusion for the treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in children with type 1 diabetes.
Data from five paediatric centres were compared in children who received 0.05 (41 episodes) or 0.1 units/kg/h (52 episodes).
In the low vs. standard dose group, at 6 h following admission, the fall in blood glucose levels [11.3 (95% confidence interval 8.6 to 13.9) vs. 11.8 (8.4 to 15.2) mmol/L, p = 0.86] and rise in pH [0.13 (0.09 to 0.18) vs. 0.11 (0.07 to 0.15), p = 0.78] were similar. These changes were comparable between doses in relation to: severity of initial acidosis, children newly diagnosed with diabetes or aged less than 5 years. After adjustment for other clinical and biochemical covariates, insulin dose was unrelated to the change in pH and blood glucose levels at 6 h following admission. Comparisons of safety data, particularly in relation to abnormal Glasgow Coma Score, were inconclusive.
In this observational study, low dose was as effective as standard dose intravenous insulin infusion in the initial treatment (less than 6 h) of DKA in children with type 1 diabetes. A randomised controlled trial is required to show true equivalence between doses and to evaluate potential safety benefits.
比较小剂量(0.05 单位/千克/小时)与标准剂量(0.1 单位/千克/小时)静脉输注胰岛素治疗 1 型糖尿病儿童糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)的效果。
比较了接受 0.05 单位/千克/小时(41 例)或 0.1 单位/千克/小时(52 例)治疗的 5 家儿科中心患儿的数据。
在低剂量与标准剂量组中,入院后 6 小时,血糖水平下降[11.3(95%置信区间 8.6 至 13.9)与 11.8(8.4 至 15.2)mmol/L,p=0.86]和 pH 值升高[0.13(0.09 至 0.18)与 0.11(0.07 至 0.15),p=0.78]相似。这些变化在初始酸中毒严重程度、新诊断为糖尿病或年龄小于 5 岁的儿童中,两种剂量之间是可比的。在校正其他临床和生化协变量后,胰岛素剂量与入院后 6 小时 pH 值和血糖水平的变化无关。安全性数据的比较,特别是与异常格拉斯哥昏迷评分的比较,结果并不明确。
在这项观察性研究中,小剂量与标准剂量静脉输注胰岛素在 1 型糖尿病儿童 DKA 的初始治疗(6 小时内)同样有效。需要进行随机对照试验来证明两种剂量之间的真正等效性,并评估潜在的安全性益处。