• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预激综合征患者房颤时的预激RR间期:房室结不应期的影响

Pre-excited RR intervals during atrial fibrillation in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: influence of the atrioventricular node refractory period.

作者信息

Fujimura O, Kuo C S, Smith B A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington 40536-0084.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Dec;18(7):1722-6. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90510-g.

DOI:10.1016/0735-1097(91)90510-g
PMID:1960320
Abstract

The ventricular rate and percent of pre-excited QRS complexes during atrial fibrillation were compared in two groups of patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Group A consisted of 22 patients whose anterograde effective refractory period of the accessory pathway was longer than that of the atrioventricular (AV) node. Group B consisted of 23 patients in whom this relation was reversed. No patient had organic heart disease. Both groups had a similar effective refractory period of the accessory pathway (288 +/- 37 vs. 280 +/- 26 ms), whereas that of the AV node was shorter in group A than group B (242 +/- 25 vs. 285 +/- 27 ms, p = 0.0001). Patients in group A had a lower percent of pre-excited QRS complexes during atrial fibrillation (39 +/- 43% vs. 93 +/- 20%, p = 0.0001). In the 21 patients whose refractory period was measured, the difference was plotted against the percent of pre-excited QRS complexes; there was a significant correlation between the two (r = -0.83, p less than 0.001). In patients in whom pre-excited RR intervals were present, the pre-excited RR intervals were compared between the two groups. Both groups had similar effective refractory periods of the accessory pathway (265 +/- 22 vs. 280 +/- 27 ms) and ventricle (200 +/- 17 vs. 211 +/- 26 ms). The effective refractory period of the AV node was shorter in group A (248 +/- 22 vs. 285 +/- 28 ms, p = 0.0005). The shortest pre-excited RR interval did not show any difference (244 +/- 37 vs. 265 +/- 41 ms). However, both the average (328 +/- 39 vs. 397 +/- 56 ms, p = 0.001) and longest (495 +/- 109 vs. 666 +/- 205 ms, p = 0.02) pre-excited RR intervals were shorter in group A.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在两组预激综合征患者中比较了房颤时的心室率和预激QRS波群的百分比。A组由22例患者组成,其旁路的前传有效不应期长于房室(AV)结。B组由23例患者组成,两者关系相反。所有患者均无器质性心脏病。两组旁路的有效不应期相似(288±37 vs. 280±26毫秒),而A组AV结的有效不应期短于B组(242±25 vs. 285±27毫秒,p = 0.0001)。A组患者房颤时预激QRS波群的百分比更低(39±43% vs. 93±20%,p = 0.0001)。在测量了不应期的21例患者中,将差值与预激QRS波群的百分比进行了绘图;两者之间存在显著相关性(r = -0.83,p < 0.001)。在存在预激RR间期的患者中,比较了两组的预激RR间期。两组旁路的有效不应期相似(265±22 vs. 280±27毫秒),心室的有效不应期也相似(200±17 vs. 211±26毫秒)。A组AV结的有效不应期较短(248±22 vs. 285±28毫秒,p = 0.0005)。最短的预激RR间期无差异(244±37 vs. 265±41毫秒)。然而,A组的平均(328±39 vs. 397±56毫秒,p = 0.001)和最长(495±109 vs. 666±205毫秒,p = 0.02)预激RR间期均较短。(摘要截短于250字)

相似文献

1
Pre-excited RR intervals during atrial fibrillation in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: influence of the atrioventricular node refractory period.预激综合征患者房颤时的预激RR间期:房室结不应期的影响
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Dec;18(7):1722-6. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90510-g.
2
Comparison of the ventricular response during atrial fibrillation in patients with enhanced atrioventricular node conduction and Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.房室结传导增强患者与预激综合征患者在心房颤动时心室反应的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Dec;10(6):1244-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(87)80125-0.
3
Role of atrial fibrillation and atrioventricular conduction (including Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) in sudden death.心房颤动与房室传导(包括预激综合征)在猝死中的作用。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Jun;5(6 Suppl):17B-22B. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80520-9.
4
Atrial fibrillation in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: incidence after surgical ablation of the accessory pathway.预激综合征患者的心房颤动:旁路手术消融后的发生率
Circulation. 1985 Jul;72(1):161-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.72.1.161.
5
Novel Assessment of Accessory Pathway Function in Patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome.预激综合征患者旁路功能的新型评估
Pediatr Cardiol. 2020 Aug;41(6):1212-1219. doi: 10.1007/s00246-020-02377-0. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
6
Transoesophageal electrophysiological evaluation of paediatric patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.小儿预激综合征患者的经食管电生理评估
Eur Heart J. 1992 Feb;13(2):220-2. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060150.
7
Atrial fibrillation in patients with an accessory pathway: importance of the conduction properties of the accessory pathway.旁路患者的心房颤动:旁路传导特性的重要性。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 May;17(6):1352-6. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80146-9.
8
[Influence of exercise on the permeability of accessory pathways and supraventricular arrhythmia in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome].[运动对预激综合征旁道传导及室上性心律失常的影响]
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1992 Oct;85(10):1443-8.
9
Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and atrial fibrillation. Relation between refractory period of accessory pathway and ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation.预激综合征与心房颤动。心房颤动时旁路不应期与心室率的关系。
Am J Cardiol. 1974 Dec;34(7):777-82. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(74)90695-x.
10
Sevoflurane has no effect on sinoatrial node function or on normal atrioventricular and accessory pathway conduction in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome during alfentanil/midazolam anesthesia.在阿芬太尼/咪达唑仑麻醉期间,七氟醚对窦性结功能或对 Wolff-Parkinson-White 综合征中的正常房室传导及旁路传导无影响。
Anesthesiology. 1999 Jan;90(1):60-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199901000-00010.

引用本文的文献

1
Old stuff still trending: use of propafenone as a safety net until catheter ablation in a patient with documented pre-excited atrial fibrillation and Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome - a classic case report.旧方法仍在流行:在一名有记录的预激性心房颤动和 Wolff-Parkinson-White 综合征患者中,在进行导管消融之前使用普罗帕酮作为安全保障——一例经典病例报告。
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2021 Nov 30;5(12):ytab485. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytab485. eCollection 2021 Dec.