Lee Siow Ming, Woll Penella J, Rudd Robin, Ferry David, O'Brien Mary, Middleton Gary, Spiro Stephen, James Lindsay, Ali Kulsam, Jitlal Mark, Hackshaw Allan
Department of Oncology, University College Hospital, 250 Euston Road, London, UK.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Aug 5;101(15):1049-57. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp200. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
Cancer cells rely on angiogenesis for growth and dissemination, and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly angiogenic tumor. We evaluated thalidomide, an anti-angiogenic agent, when combined with chemotherapy and as maintenance treatment.
A total of 724 patients (51% with limited and 49% with extensive disease) were randomly assigned to receive placebo or thalidomide capsules, 100-200 mg daily for up to 2 years. All patients received etoposide and carboplatin every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. Endpoints were overall survival, progression-free survival, tumor response rate, toxicity, and quality of life (QoL). Hazard ratios (HRs) for comparing thalidomide against placebo were estimated using Cox regression modeling. Statistical tests were two-sided.
The median overall survival was 10.5 months (placebo) and 10.1 months (thalidomide) (HR for death = 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.93 to 1.27; P = .28). Among patients with limited-stage disease, there was no evidence of a survival difference (HR for death = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.73 to 1.15), but among patients with extensive disease, survival was worse in the thalidomide group (HR for death = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.68). Progression-free survival rates were also similar in the two groups (HR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.92 to 1.24). Thalidomide was associated with an increased risk of having a thrombotic event, mainly pulmonary embolus and deep vein thrombosis (19% thalidomide vs 10% placebo; HR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.41 to 3.20; P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences between treatments in hematological and nonhematological toxic effects, except more patients in the thalidomide group had rash, constipation, or neuropathy. Overall, QoL scores were similar in the two treatment groups, but thalidomide was associated with less insomnia and diarrhea and more constipation and peripheral neuropathy.
In this large randomized trial, thalidomide in combination with chemotherapy did not improve survival of patients with SCLC but was associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events.
癌细胞的生长和扩散依赖于血管生成,而小细胞肺癌(SCLC)是一种高度血管生成性肿瘤。我们评估了沙利度胺这种抗血管生成药物,将其与化疗联合使用并作为维持治疗。
总共724例患者(51%为局限期,49%为广泛期)被随机分配接受安慰剂或沙利度胺胶囊,每日100 - 200毫克,持续长达2年。所有患者每3周接受依托泊苷和卡铂治疗,最多6个周期。终点指标为总生存期、无进展生存期、肿瘤缓解率、毒性和生活质量(QoL)。使用Cox回归模型估计比较沙利度胺与安慰剂的风险比(HRs)。统计检验为双侧检验。
中位总生存期安慰剂组为10.5个月,沙利度胺组为10.1个月(死亡HR = 1.09,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.93至1.27;P = 0.28)。在局限期疾病患者中,没有生存差异的证据(死亡HR = 0.91,95% CI = 0.73至1.15),但在广泛期疾病患者中,沙利度胺组的生存期更差(死亡HR = 1.36,95% CI = 1.10至1.68)。两组的无进展生存率也相似(HR = 1.07,95% CI = 0.92至1.24)。沙利度胺与血栓形成事件风险增加相关,主要是肺栓塞和深静脉血栓形成(沙利度胺组为19%,安慰剂组为10%;HR = 2.13,95% CI = 1.41至3.20;P < 0.001)。血液学和非血液学毒性方面,治疗组之间没有统计学上的显著差异,只是沙利度胺组有更多患者出现皮疹、便秘或神经病变。总体而言,两个治疗组的QoL评分相似,但沙利度胺与较少的失眠和腹泻以及较多的便秘和周围神经病变相关。
在这项大型随机试验中,沙利度胺联合化疗并未改善SCLC患者的生存期,但与血栓形成事件风险增加相关。