• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卡维地洛与静脉曲张套扎术预防首次静脉曲张出血的随机对照试验

Randomized controlled trial of carvedilol versus variceal band ligation for the prevention of the first variceal bleed.

作者信息

Tripathi Dhiraj, Ferguson James W, Kochar Narendra, Leithead Joanna A, Therapondos George, McAvoy Norma C, Stanley Adrian J, Forrest Ewan H, Hislop William S, Mills Peter R, Hayes Peter C

机构信息

Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Hepatology. 2009 Sep;50(3):825-33. doi: 10.1002/hep.23045.

DOI:10.1002/hep.23045
PMID:19610055
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Current therapy for preventing the first variceal bleed includes beta-blocker and variceal band ligation (VBL). VBL has lower bleeding rates, with no differences in survival, whereas beta-blocker therapy can be limited by side effects. Carvedilol, a non-cardioselective vasodilating beta-blocker, is more effective in reducing portal pressure than propranolol; however, there have been no clinical studies assessing the efficacy of carvedilol in primary prophylaxis. The goal of this study was to compare carvedilol and VBL for the prevention of the first variceal bleed in a randomized controlled multicenter trial. One hundred fifty-two cirrhotic patients from five different centers with grade II or larger esophageal varices were randomized to either carvedilol 12.5 mg once daily or VBL performed every 2 weeks until eradication using a multibander device. Seventy-seven patients were randomized to carvedilol and 75 to VBL. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups (alcoholic liver disease, 73%; median Child-Pugh score, 8; median age, 54 years; median follow-up, 20 months). On intention-to-treat analysis, carvedilol had lower rates of the first variceal bleed (10% versus 23%; relative hazard 0.41; 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.96 [P = 0.04]), with no significant differences in overall mortality (35% versus 37%, P = 0.71), and bleeding-related mortality (3% versus 1%, P = 0.26). Six patients in the VBL group bled as a result of banding ulcers. Per-protocol analysis revealed no significant differences in the outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Carvedilol is effective in preventing the first variceal bleed. Carvedilol is an option for primary prophylaxis in patients with high-risk esophageal varices.

摘要

未标注

目前预防首次静脉曲张出血的治疗方法包括使用β受体阻滞剂和静脉曲张套扎术(VBL)。VBL的出血率较低,生存率无差异,而β受体阻滞剂治疗可能会受到副作用的限制。卡维地洛是一种非选择性血管舒张β受体阻滞剂,在降低门静脉压力方面比普萘洛尔更有效;然而,尚无临床研究评估卡维地洛在一级预防中的疗效。本研究的目的是在一项随机对照多中心试验中比较卡维地洛和VBL预防首次静脉曲张出血的效果。来自五个不同中心的152例患有II级或更大食管静脉曲张的肝硬化患者被随机分为两组,一组每天服用一次12.5mg卡维地洛,另一组每2周进行一次VBL,直至使用多环扎装置根除静脉曲张。77例患者被随机分配至卡维地洛组,75例患者被随机分配至VBL组。两组的基线特征无差异(酒精性肝病,73%;Child-Pugh评分中位数,8;年龄中位数,54岁;随访中位数,20个月)。在意向性分析中,卡维地洛组首次静脉曲张出血率较低(10%对23%;相对风险0.41;95%置信区间0.19 - 0.96 [P = 0.04]),总体死亡率(35%对37%,P = 0.71)和出血相关死亡率(3%对1%,P = 0.26)无显著差异。VBL组有6例患者因套扎溃疡出血。符合方案分析显示结果无显著差异。

结论

卡维地洛在预防首次静脉曲张出血方面有效。卡维地洛是高危食管静脉曲张患者一级预防的一种选择。

相似文献

1
Randomized controlled trial of carvedilol versus variceal band ligation for the prevention of the first variceal bleed.卡维地洛与静脉曲张套扎术预防首次静脉曲张出血的随机对照试验
Hepatology. 2009 Sep;50(3):825-33. doi: 10.1002/hep.23045.
2
Carvedilol vs. esophageal variceal band ligation in the primary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.卡维地洛与食管静脉曲张套扎术在预防静脉曲张出血中的比较:一项多中心随机对照试验。
J Hepatol. 2014 Apr;60(4):757-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.11.019. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
3
Multicentre randomised controlled study comparing carvedilol with variceal band ligation in the prevention of variceal rebleeding.多中心随机对照研究比较卡维地洛与食管静脉曲张套扎术预防静脉曲张再出血。
J Hepatol. 2014 Nov;61(5):1014-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.06.015. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
4
Efficacy of carvedilol versus propranolol versus variceal band ligation for primary prevention of variceal bleeding.卡维地洛与普萘洛尔和食管静脉曲张套扎术预防静脉曲张出血的疗效比较。
Hepatol Int. 2018 Jan;12(1):75-82. doi: 10.1007/s12072-017-9835-9. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
5
Combination of carvedilol with variceal band ligation in prevention of first variceal bleed in Child-Turcotte-Pugh B and C cirrhosis with high-risk oesophageal varices: the 'CAVARLY TRIAL'.卡维地洛联合食管静脉曲张套扎术预防 Child-Turcotte-Pugh B 和 C 级肝硬化伴高危食管静脉曲张首次静脉曲张出血的研究(CAVARLY 试验)。
Gut. 2024 Oct 7;73(11):1844-1853. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331181.
6
Carvedilol for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with haemodynamic non-response to propranolol.卡维地洛治疗普萘洛尔治疗反应不佳的肝硬化患者原发性预防静脉曲张出血。
Gut. 2013 Nov;62(11):1634-41. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304038. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
7
Endoscopic variceal ligation plus propranolol versus endoscopic variceal ligation alone in primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding.内镜下静脉曲张套扎术联合普萘洛尔与单纯内镜下静脉曲张套扎术在预防静脉曲张出血一级预防中的比较
Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Apr;100(4):797-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40468.x.
8
Ligation versus propranolol for the primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis.结扎术与普萘洛尔用于肝硬化静脉曲张出血的一级预防比较
Hepatology. 2004 Jul;40(1):65-72. doi: 10.1002/hep.20284.
9
Randomized, controlled trial of carvedilol versus nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate for the prevention of variceal rebleeding.卡维地洛与那多洛尔加单硝酸异山梨酯预防静脉曲张再出血的随机对照试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Nov;27(11):1681-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07244.x.
10
Variceal band ligation versus beta-blockers for primary prevention of variceal bleeding: a meta-analysis.内镜下套扎术与β受体阻滞剂用于预防静脉曲张出血的一级预防:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Oct;19(10):835-45. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3282748f07.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in the diagnosis and management of clinically significant portal hypertension in cirrhosis: A narrative review.肝硬化中具有临床意义的门静脉高压症的诊断与管理进展:一篇叙述性综述。
World J Hepatol. 2025 Jun 27;17(6):104761. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i6.104761.
2
Safety of Anticoagulant Treatment in Patients With Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis and History of Portal Hypertension-Related Bleeding.患有脾静脉血栓形成及门静脉高压相关出血史患者的抗凝治疗安全性
Liver Int. 2025 Jun;45(6):e70114. doi: 10.1111/liv.70114.
3
Endoscopic variceal ligation combined with carvedilol versus endoscopic variceal ligation combined with propranolol for the treatment of oesophageal variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
内镜下静脉曲张套扎术联合卡维地洛与内镜下静脉曲张套扎术联合普萘洛尔治疗肝硬化食管静脉曲张出血的多中心随机对照试验研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 27;15(4):e093866. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093866.
4
Clinical Trial: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial of Carvedilol Versus Variceal Band Ligation in Primary Prevention of Variceal Bleeding in Liver Cirrhosis (CALIBRE Trial).临床试验:卡维地洛与曲张静脉套扎术预防肝硬化静脉曲张出血一级预防的多中心随机对照试验(CALIBRE试验)
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Jun;61(11):1740-1754. doi: 10.1111/apt.70080. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
5
Preventing the progression of cirrhosis to decompensation and death.预防肝硬化进展至失代偿期和死亡。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Apr;22(4):265-280. doi: 10.1038/s41575-024-01031-x. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
6
Outpatient management after hospitalisation for acute decompensation of cirrhosis: A practical guide.肝硬化急性失代偿住院后的门诊管理:实用指南。
World J Hepatol. 2024 Dec 27;16(12):1377-1394. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i12.1377.
7
Efficacy and safety of variceal embolization for primary prophylaxis in cirrhosis patients with challenges in standard treatments: preliminary results.静脉曲张栓塞术用于标准治疗存在挑战的肝硬化患者一级预防的疗效和安全性:初步结果
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 15;11:1401900. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1401900. eCollection 2024.
8
Management of Portal Hypertension in the Older Patient.老年患者门静脉高压症的处理。
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2024 Sep;26(9):231-240. doi: 10.1007/s11894-024-00930-y. Epub 2024 May 23.
9
Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines on liver transplantation.亚太肝病学会肝脏移植临床实践指南。
Hepatol Int. 2024 Apr;18(2):299-383. doi: 10.1007/s12072-023-10629-3. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
10
Compensated liver cirrhosis: Natural course and disease-modifying strategies.代偿期肝硬化:自然病程及疾病修饰策略
World J Methodol. 2023 Sep 20;13(4):179-193. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v13.i4.179.