Suppr超能文献

结扎术与普萘洛尔用于肝硬化静脉曲张出血的一级预防比较

Ligation versus propranolol for the primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis.

作者信息

Schepke Michael, Kleber Gerhard, Nürnberg Dieter, Willert Jörg, Koch Lydia, Veltzke-Schlieker Wilfried, Hellerbrand Claus, Kuth Johannes, Schanz Stefan, Kahl Stefan, Fleig Wolfgang E, Sauerbruch Tilman

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Hepatology. 2004 Jul;40(1):65-72. doi: 10.1002/hep.20284.

Abstract

In this randomized controlled multicenter trial, we compared endoscopic variceal banding ligation (VBL) with propranolol (PPL) for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. One hundred fifty-two cirrhotic patients with 2 or more esophageal varices (diameter >5 mm) without prior bleeding were randomized to VBL (n = 75) or PPL (n = 77). The groups were well matched with respect to baseline characteristics (age 56 +/- 10 years, alcoholic etiology 51%, Child-Pugh score 7.2 +/- 1.8). The mean follow-up was 34 +/- 19 months. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Neither bleeding incidence nor mortality differed significantly between the 2 groups. Variceal bleeding occurred in 25% of the VBL group and in 29% of the PPL group. The actuarial risks of bleeding after 2 years were 20% (VBL) and 18% (PPL). Fatal bleeding was observed in 12% (VBL) and 10% (PPL). It was associated with the ligation procedure in 2 patients (2.6%). Overall mortality was 45% (VBL) and 43% (PPL) with the 2-year actuarial risks being 28% (VBL) and 22% (PPL). 25% of patients withdrew from PPL treatment, 16% due to side effects. In conclusion, VBL and PPL were similarly effective for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. VBL should be offered to patients who are not candidates for long-term PPL treatment.

摘要

在这项随机对照多中心试验中,我们比较了内镜下静脉曲张套扎术(VBL)与普萘洛尔(PPL)用于静脉曲张出血一级预防的效果。152例患有2条或更多条食管静脉曲张(直径>5mm)且既往未出血的肝硬化患者被随机分为VBL组(n = 75)或PPL组(n = 77)。两组在基线特征方面匹配良好(年龄56±10岁,酒精性病因占51%,Child-Pugh评分7.2±1.8)。平均随访时间为34±19个月。数据按意向性分析。两组之间的出血发生率和死亡率均无显著差异。VBL组25%的患者发生静脉曲张出血,PPL组为29%。2年后出血的精算风险分别为20%(VBL)和18%(PPL)。VBL组12%的患者和PPL组10%的患者发生致命性出血。其中2例患者(2.6%)的致命性出血与套扎操作有关。总体死亡率在VBL组为45%,PPL组为43%,2年精算风险分别为28%(VBL)和22%(PPL)。25%的患者退出PPL治疗,其中16%是由于副作用。总之,VBL和PPL在静脉曲张出血一级预防中同样有效。对于不适合长期PPL治疗的患者,应采用VBL治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验