Yan Xin, Gao Yu-nong, Jiang Guo-qing, Gao Min, An Na
Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Peking University School of Oncology, China.
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009 Mar;31(3):208-12.
To investigate the impact of surgical resection extent and other clinicopathological characteristics on the prognosis in patients with clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma.
The data of 135 surgically treated patients with clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-seven patients (group A) underwent simple hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy with or without pelvic lymphadenectomy. The other 78 patients (group B) received sub-radical or radical hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy with or without pelvic lymphadenectomy. The impact of surgery extent and other clinicopathological characteristics on the prognosis in patients with clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed.
There were no significant differences between two groups in the pathological stage, pathologic type, tumor grade, depth of myometrial invasion, vascular tumor emboli, ovary invasion, lymph node metastasis, positive peritoneal cytology and adjuvant therapy (P > 0.05). However, the patients in group A had a significantly shorter operating time (105 vs. 145 min), less estimated blood loss (150 vs. 300 ml) and blood transfusion (0 approximately 600 vs. 0 approximately 1200 ml), and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (12 vs. 13 days) than that in group B (all P < 0.05). The overall rates of post-operative complications were 15.8% in group A versus 26.9% in group B (P > 0.05). The recurrence rate in the group A was 14.0% versus 6.4% in group B (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the five-year survival rate in group A was 76.9% versus 85.8% in group B (P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the important risk factors for clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma were deep myometrium invasion, high pathological grade, positive peritoneal cytology and ovarian metastasis, rather than surgical resection extent.
Surgery extent is not an important factor affecting the prognosis in patients with clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma, and extended surgery does not improve their survival. Therefore, excessive resection should be avoided in such cases.
探讨手术切除范围及其他临床病理特征对临床Ⅰ期子宫内膜癌患者预后的影响。
回顾性分析135例接受手术治疗的临床Ⅰ期子宫内膜癌患者的数据。57例患者(A组)行单纯子宫切除术及双侧输卵管卵巢切除术,伴或不伴盆腔淋巴结清扫术。另外78例患者(B组)接受次广泛或广泛子宫切除术及双侧输卵管卵巢切除术,伴或不伴盆腔淋巴结清扫术。回顾性分析手术范围及其他临床病理特征对临床Ⅰ期子宫内膜癌患者预后的影响。
两组在病理分期、病理类型、肿瘤分级、肌层浸润深度、血管内瘤栓、卵巢浸润、淋巴结转移、腹腔细胞学阳性及辅助治疗方面差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。然而,A组患者手术时间明显短于B组(105 vs. 145分钟),估计失血量(150 vs. 300毫升)及输血量(0~600 vs. 0~1200毫升)均少于B组,术后住院时间也短于B组(12 vs. 13天)(均P<0.05)。A组术后并发症总发生率为15.8%,B组为26.9%(P>0.05)。A组复发率为14.0%,B组为6.4%(P>0.05)。此外,A组五年生存率为76.9%,B组为85.8%(P>0.05)。多因素分析表明,临床Ⅰ期子宫内膜癌的重要危险因素为肌层深层浸润、高病理分级、腹腔细胞学阳性及卵巢转移,而非手术切除范围。
手术切除范围不是影响临床Ⅰ期子宫内膜癌患者预后的重要因素,扩大手术并不能提高其生存率。因此,此类病例应避免过度切除。