Valentin Jean-Pierre, Bialecki Russell, Ewart Lorna, Hammond Tim, Leishmann Derek, Lindgren Silvana, Martinez Vicente, Pollard Chris, Redfern Will, Wallis Rob
Safety Assessment UK, AstraZeneca R&D Alderley Park, Macclesfield, SK10 4TG, United Kingdom.
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2009 Sep-Oct;60(2):152-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2009.05.011. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
This article outlines a strategy for collecting accurate data for the determination of the sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of safety pharmacology models. This entails performing a retrospective analysis on commonly used safety pharmacology endpoints and an objective assessment of new non-clinical models. Such assessments require a systematic quantitative analysis of safety pharmacology parameters as well as clinical Phase I adverse events. Once the sensitivity, specificity and predictive capacity of models have been determined, they can be aligned within specific phases of the drug discovery and development pipeline for maximal impact, or removed from the screening cascade altogether. Furthermore, data will contribute to evidence-based decision-making based on the knowledge of the model sensitivity and specificity. This strategy should therefore contribute to the reduction of candidate drug attrition and a more appropriate use of animals. More data are needed to increase the power of analysis and enable more accurate comparisons of models e.g. pharmacokinetic/phamacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships as well as non-clinical and clinical outcomes for determining concordance. This task requires the collaboration and agreement of pharmaceutical companies to share data anonymously on proprietary and candidate drugs.
本文概述了一种收集准确数据的策略,用于确定安全药理学模型的敏感性、特异性和预测价值。这需要对常用的安全药理学终点进行回顾性分析,并对新的非临床模型进行客观评估。此类评估需要对安全药理学参数以及临床I期不良事件进行系统的定量分析。一旦确定了模型的敏感性、特异性和预测能力,就可以在药物发现和开发流程的特定阶段进行调整,以实现最大影响,或者完全从筛选级联中移除。此外,基于模型敏感性和特异性的知识,数据将有助于基于证据的决策。因此,该策略应有助于减少候选药物的损耗,并更合理地使用动物。需要更多数据来增强分析能力,并能够更准确地比较模型,例如药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)关系以及用于确定一致性的非临床和临床结果。这项任务需要制药公司的合作与同意,以便匿名共享关于专利药物和候选药物的数据。