• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生援助是否重要?

Does health aid matter?

机构信息

Research Department, International Monetary Fund, 700 19th Street NW, Washington, DC 20431, USA.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2009 Jul;28(4):855-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.05.004. Epub 2009 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.05.004
PMID:19616864
Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between health aid and infant mortality, using data from 118 countries between 1973 and 2004. Health aid has a beneficial and statistically significant effect on infant mortality: doubling per capita health aid is associated with a 2 percent reduction in the infant mortality rate. For the average country, this implies that increasing per capita health aid by US$1.60 per year is associated with 1.5 fewer infant deaths per thousand births. The estimated effect is small, relative to the 2015 target envisioned by the Millennium Development Goals. It implies that achieving the MDG target through additional health aid alone would require a roughly 15-fold increase in current levels of aid.

摘要

本文利用 1973 年至 2004 年间 118 个国家的数据,考察了卫生援助与婴儿死亡率之间的关系。卫生援助对婴儿死亡率有积极的、统计上显著的影响:人均卫生援助增加一倍,婴儿死亡率就会降低 2%。对于平均水平的国家来说,这意味着每年人均卫生援助增加 1.60 美元,每千例出生就会减少 1.5 例婴儿死亡。相对于千年发展目标所设想的 2015 年目标而言,这一估计效果很小。这意味着仅通过额外的卫生援助来实现千年发展目标,就需要将目前的援助水平提高约 15 倍。

相似文献

1
Does health aid matter?卫生援助是否重要?
J Health Econ. 2009 Jul;28(4):855-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.05.004. Epub 2009 Jun 13.
2
The effect of changes in health sector resources on infant mortality in the short-run and the long-run: a longitudinal econometric analysis.卫生部门资源变化对短期和长期婴儿死亡率的影响:一项纵向计量经济学分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Jun;68(11):1918-25. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.03.023. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
3
Financing global health: mission unaccomplished.全球卫生筹资:任务未完成。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jul-Aug;26(4):921-34. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.4.921.
4
[Methods for the evaluation of a health intervention in developing countries: the case in the Arsi region, Ethiopia].[发展中国家卫生干预措施的评估方法:以埃塞俄比亚阿尔西地区为例]
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 1991;27(2):325-30.
5
Health care financing and health outcomes in Pacific Island countries.太平洋岛国的医疗保健融资与健康结果
Health Policy Plan. 2009 Jan;24(1):72-81. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czn044. Epub 2008 Dec 9.
6
Cost-effective outlays for better health outcomes.为实现更好的健康结果而进行的具有成本效益的支出。
World Health Forum. 1995;16(3):287-92.
7
[A decade of child health research in developing countries].[发展中国家儿童健康研究的十年]
Sante. 2003 Apr-Jun;13(2):69-75.
8
Projecting the impact of AIDS on mortality.预测艾滋病对死亡率的影响。
AIDS. 1998;12 Suppl 1:S29-39.
9
Mortality and development revisited.死亡率与发展再探讨。
Popul Bull UN. 1985(18):34-40.
10
Prospects for higher infant survival.提高婴儿存活率的前景。
World Health Forum. 1990;11(1):78-84.

引用本文的文献

1
From Aid to Impact: The Cost-Effectiveness of Global Health Aid in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Evolving Role of Microinsurance.从援助到影响:撒哈拉以南非洲地区全球卫生援助的成本效益及小额保险的角色演变
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 16;13(14):1716. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141716.
2
The long-run effects of health aid in low-income countries.健康援助对低收入国家的长期影响。
J Public Health Afr. 2023 Apr 19;14(4):2219. doi: 10.4081/jphia.2023.2219. eCollection 2023 Apr 30.
3
Leveraging COVID-19 pandemic response for improved health system financing: Lessons from Ghana.
利用 COVID-19 大流行应对措施改善卫生系统筹资:来自加纳的经验教训。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2022 Jul;37(4):2211-2223. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3462. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
4
Analytic approaches to assess the impact of local spending on sexually transmitted diseases.分析方法评估地方性病防治支出的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun;57(3):644-653. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13915. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
5
Donor Commitments and Disbursements for Sexual and Reproductive Health Aid in Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia.肯尼亚、坦桑尼亚、乌干达和赞比亚的性健康和生殖健康援助捐赠承诺和支出
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 20;9:645499. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.645499. eCollection 2021.
6
The effects of health expenditure on infant mortality in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from panel data analysis.撒哈拉以南非洲地区卫生支出对婴儿死亡率的影响:来自面板数据分析的证据
Health Econ Rev. 2020 Mar 6;10(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13561-020-00262-3.
7
Maternal Mortality and Public Health Programs: Evidence from Florida.产妇死亡率与公共卫生项目:来自佛罗里达州的证据。
Milbank Q. 2020 Mar;98(1):150-171. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12442. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
8
Has Gavi lived up to its promise? Quasi-experimental evidence on country immunisation rates and child mortality.全球疫苗免疫联盟是否兑现了承诺?关于国家免疫接种率和儿童死亡率的准实验证据。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Dec 3;4(6):e001789. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001789. eCollection 2019.
9
An Assessment of Domestic Financing for Reproductive, Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health in Sub-Saharan Africa: Potential Gains and Fiscal Space.撒哈拉以南非洲生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康的国内筹资评估:潜在收益和财政空间。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Dec;18(6):789-799. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00508-0.
10
Impact of macro-fiscal determinants on health financing: empirical evidence from low-and middle-income countries.宏观财政决定因素对卫生筹资的影响:来自低收入和中等收入国家的实证证据
Glob Health Res Policy. 2019 Aug 9;4:21. doi: 10.1186/s41256-019-0112-4. eCollection 2019.