Suppr超能文献

植入式心脏复律除颤器在社区一级预防中的应用:男性和女性是否同样符合试验入组标准?

Use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators for primary prevention in the community: do women and men equally meet trial enrollment criteria?

作者信息

Daugherty Stacie L, Peterson Pamela N, Wang Yongfei, Curtis Jeptha P, Heidenreich Paul A, Lindenfeld Joann, Vidaillet Humberto J, Masoudi Frederick A

机构信息

University of Colorado Denver, Division of Cardiology, 12631 E. 17th Ave., Mailstop B130, PO Box 6511, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2009 Aug;158(2):224-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.05.018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fewer women than men undergo implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. The criteria used to select patients for ICD implantation may be more permissive among men than for women. We hypothesized that women who undergo primary prevention ICD implantation more often meet strict trial enrollment criteria for this therapy.

METHODS

We studied 59,812 patients in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD registry undergoing initial primary prevention ICD placement between January 2005 and April 2007. Patients were classified as meeting or not meeting enrollment criteria of either the MADIT-II or SCD-HeFT trials. Multivariable analyses assessed the association between gender and concordance with trial criteria adjusting for demographic, clinical, and system characteristics.

RESULTS

Among the cohort, 27% (n = 16,072) were women. Overall, 85.2% of women and 84.5% of men met enrollment criteria of either trial (P = .05). In multivariable analyses, women were equally likely to meet trial criteria (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.99-1.10) than men. Significantly more women than men met the trial enrollment criteria among patients older than age 65 (86.6% of women vs 85.3% of men, OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.19), but this difference was not found among younger patients (82.5% of women vs 83.0% of men, OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89-1.07).

CONCLUSIONS

In a national cohort undergoing primary prevention ICD implantation, older women were only slightly more likely then men to meet the enrollment criteria for MADIT II or SCD-HeFT. Relative overutilization in men is not an important explanation for gender differences in ICD implantation.

摘要

背景

接受植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)植入以进行心脏性猝死一级预防的女性少于男性。用于选择ICD植入患者的标准在男性中可能比在女性中更宽松。我们推测,接受一级预防ICD植入的女性更常符合该治疗的严格试验入组标准。

方法

我们研究了2005年1月至2007年4月期间在国家心血管数据注册中心ICD注册库中接受首次一级预防ICD植入的59812例患者。患者被分类为符合或不符合MADIT-II或SCD-HeFT试验的入组标准。多变量分析评估了性别与符合试验标准之间的关联,并对人口统计学、临床和系统特征进行了调整。

结果

在该队列中,27%(n = 16072)为女性。总体而言,85.2%的女性和84.5%的男性符合任一试验的入组标准(P = 0.05)。在多变量分析中,女性与男性一样有可能符合试验标准(OR 1.04,95%CI 0.99 - 1.10)。65岁以上患者中,符合试验入组标准的女性明显多于男性(86.6%的女性 vs 85.3%的男性,OR 1.11,95%CI 1.03 - 1.19),但在年轻患者中未发现这种差异(82.5%的女性 vs 83.0%的男性,OR 0.97,95%CI 0.89 - 1.07)。

结论

在接受一级预防ICD植入的全国性队列中,老年女性比男性仅略更有可能符合MADIT II或SCD-HeFT的入组标准。男性相对过度使用并非ICD植入性别差异的重要解释。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验