Suppr超能文献

在新西兰卫生系统中实施新的治理模式:一项实证研究。

Implementing new modes of governance in the New Zealand health system: an empirical study.

机构信息

Health Sciences Centre, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2009 Dec;93(2-3):118-27. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.06.004. Epub 2009 Jul 19.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Health governance internationally has become more complex, with both hierarchical and network modes of governance explicitly represented within single public systems.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the implementation of new modes and mechanisms of governance under New Zealand health reforms and to assess these in the context of international trends. Research methods sought data from key groups participating in governance policy and implementation. Methods included surveys of board members (N=144, 66% response rate), interviews with chairs (N=14) and chief executives (N=20), and interviews with national policy makers/officials (N=19) and non-government providers and local stakeholders (N=10). Data were collected over two time periods (2001/2002; 2003/2004). Analysis integrated the findings of both qualitative and quantitative methods under themes related to modes and mechanisms of governance. Results indicate that a hierarchical mode of governance was implemented quickly, with mechanisms to ensure political accountability to the government. Over the implementation period the scope of decision-making at different levels required clarification and mechanisms for accountability required adjustment. Non-government provider networks emerged only slowly whereas a network of statutory health organisations established itself quickly.

CONCLUSION

The successful implementation of a mix of governance modes in New Zealand 2001-2004 was characterised by clear government policy, flexibility of approach and the appearance of an unintended network. In New Zealand there is less tendency than in some other some other small countries/jurisdictions towards centralisation, with local elections and community engagement policies providing an element of local participation, and accountability to the centre enhanced through political rather than bureaucratic mechanisms.

摘要

未加标签

国际卫生治理变得更加复杂,单一公共系统中明确体现了等级制和网络制两种治理模式。

目的

了解新西兰卫生改革中新的治理模式和机制的实施情况,并结合国际趋势对此进行评估。研究方法从参与治理政策和实施的主要群体中获取数据。方法包括对董事会成员(N=144,回应率为 66%)进行调查、对主席(N=14)和首席执行官(N=20)进行访谈、对国家政策制定者/官员(N=19)和非政府提供者以及地方利益攸关方(N=10)进行访谈。数据在两个时间段(2001/2002;2003/2004)收集。分析将定性和定量方法的结果整合在与治理模式和机制相关的主题下。结果表明,等级制治理模式迅速实施,建立了向政府负责的机制。在实施期间,需要明确不同层面的决策范围,并调整问责机制。非政府提供者网络的发展非常缓慢,而法定卫生组织网络则迅速建立起来。

结论

2001-2004 年,新西兰成功实施了多种治理模式,其特点是政府政策明确、方法灵活,以及出现了一个意外的网络。与一些其他小国家/司法管辖区相比,新西兰的中央集权趋势较小,地方选举和社区参与政策提供了一定的地方参与,通过政治而非官僚机制加强了对中心的问责。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验