Lubbe Steven J, Di Bernardo Maria Chiara, Chandler Ian P, Houlston Richard S
Section of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 20;27(24):3975-80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6853. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
Biallelic mutations in the base excision DNA repair gene MUTYH predispose to colorectal cancer (CRC). Evidence that monoallelic mutations also confer an elevated CRC risk is controversial. Precise quantification of the CRC risk and the phenotype associated with MUTYH mutations is relevant to the counseling, surveillance, and clinical management of at-risk individuals.
We analyzed a population-based series of 9,268 patients with CRC and 5,064 controls for the Y179C and G396D MUTYH mutations. We related genotypes to phenotype and calculated genotype-specific CRC risks.
Overall, biallelic mutation status conferred a 28-fold increase in CRC risk (95% CI,17.66 to 44.06); this accounted for 0.3% of CRCs in the cohort. Genotype relative risks of CRC were strongly age dependent, but penetrance was incomplete at age 60 years. CRC that developed in the context of biallelic mutations were microsatellite stable. Biallelic mutation carriers were more likely to have proximal CRC (P = 4.0 x 10(-4)) and synchronous polyps (P = 5.7 x 10(-9)) than noncarriers. The performance characteristics of clinicopathologic criteria for the identification of biallelic mutations are poor. Monoallelic mutation was not associated with an increased CRC risk (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.31).
The high risk and the propensity for proximal disease associated with biallielic MUTYH mutation justify colonoscopic surveillance. Although mutation screening should be directed to patients with APC-negative polyposis and early-onset proximal MSS CRC in whom detection rates will be highest, the expanded phenotype associated with MUTYH mutation needs to be recognized. There is no evidence than monoallelic mutation status per se is clinically important.
碱基切除DNA修复基因MUTYH的双等位基因突变易患结直肠癌(CRC)。单等位基因突变也会增加患CRC风险的证据存在争议。精确量化CRC风险以及与MUTYH突变相关的表型,对于高危个体的咨询、监测和临床管理具有重要意义。
我们分析了一个基于人群的队列,其中包括9268例CRC患者和5064例对照,检测Y179C和G396D MUTYH突变。我们将基因型与表型相关联,并计算基因型特异性CRC风险。
总体而言,双等位基因突变状态使CRC风险增加了28倍(95%CI,17.66至44.06);这占队列中CRC病例的0.3%。CRC的基因型相对风险强烈依赖于年龄,但在60岁时外显率不完全。双等位基因突变背景下发生的CRC是微卫星稳定的。与非携带者相比,双等位基因突变携带者更易患近端CRC(P = 4.0 x 10(-4))和同步息肉(P = 5.7 x 10(-9))。用于识别双等位基因突变的临床病理标准的性能特征较差。单等位基因突变与CRC风险增加无关(优势比,1.07;95%CI,0.87至1.31)。
与双等位基因MUTYH突变相关的高风险和近端疾病倾向证明了结肠镜监测的合理性。尽管突变筛查应针对APC阴性息肉病患者和早期近端MSS CRC患者,因为在这些患者中检测率最高,但需要认识到与MUTYH突变相关的扩展表型。没有证据表明单等位基因突变状态本身具有临床重要性。