Rouillon Isabelle, Leboulanger Nicolas, Roger Gilles, Maulet Michel, Marlin Sandrine, Loundon Natalie, Portnoï Marie France, Denoyelle Francoise, Garabédian Erea Noel
Service d'Otorhinolaryngologie et de Chirurgie Cervico-Faciale, Hôpital d'Enfants Armand-Trousseau, APHP and UPMC Univ Paris 6, 26 avenue Arnold Netter, 75571 Paris Cedex 12, France.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Jul;135(7):652-6. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2009.64.
To evaluate the results of velopharyngoplasty for velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) in relation to 22q11 deletion or nonsyndromic VPI.
Retrospective study.
Academic medical center.
Eleven of 45 patients with 22q11 microdeletion (group 1) and 9 patients without 22q11 microdeletion (group 2) with noncleft VPI (hypoplastic velum or hypodynamic velopharynx and deep pharynx) underwent velopharyngoplasty (midline pharyngeal flap with superior pedicle). Exclusion criteria included cleft palate, submucous cleft palate, all syndromic cases, and all associated malformations (except those related to 22q11 microdeletion in patients with DiGeorge syndrome).
Speech assessment before surgery using the Borel-Maisonny scale and at 9 months and 24 months after surgery. Velopharyngeal insufficiency was classified as normal, inconsistent, mild, moderate, and severe.
Before surgery, in group 1, 3 patients had mild and 8 had severe VPI, and in group 2, 1 had mild and 8 had severe VPI. Postoperative outcomes at 9 months showed that in group 1, 2 patients had excellent results (normal and inconsistent) and 9 had mild VPI, while in group 2, 6 patients had excellent results and 3 had mild VPI (P = .03). Postoperative outcomes at 24 months showed that in group 1, 10 patients had excellent results and 1 had mild VPI, while in group 2, 8 patients had excellent results and 1 had mild VPI.
Surgical treatment of noncleft VPI by pharyngoplasty was efficient in 10 of the 11 patients (91%) in the 22q11 group and in 8 of the 9 patients (89%) in the nonsyndromic group. Postoperative remission took longer for patients with the 22q11 microdeletion than for the control group. However, long-term results following surgical treatment were equally good in the 2 groups.
评估腭咽成形术治疗22q11缺失或非综合征性腭咽闭合不全(VPI)的效果。
回顾性研究。
学术医学中心。
45例22q11微缺失患者中的11例(第1组)和9例无22q11微缺失的患者(第2组),均为非腭裂性VPI(软腭发育不全或腭咽动力不足及咽腔深),接受了腭咽成形术(带蒂上正中咽瓣)。排除标准包括腭裂、黏膜下腭裂、所有综合征病例以及所有相关畸形(迪乔治综合征患者中与22q11微缺失相关的畸形除外)。
术前使用博雷尔 - 迈松尼量表进行语音评估,术后9个月和24个月进行评估。腭咽闭合不全分为正常、不一致、轻度、中度和重度。
术前,第1组中3例为轻度VPI,8例为重度VPI;第2组中1例为轻度VPI,8例为重度VPI。9个月时的术后结果显示,第1组中2例效果极佳(正常和不一致),9例为轻度VPI;第2组中6例效果极佳,3例为轻度VPI(P = 0.03)。24个月时的术后结果显示,第1组中10例效果极佳,1例为轻度VPI;第2组中8例效果极佳,1例为轻度VPI。
腭咽成形术治疗非腭裂性VPI,在22q11组的11例患者中有10例(91%)有效,在非综合征组的9例患者中有8例(89%)有效。22q11微缺失患者术后缓解时间比对照组更长。然而,两组手术治疗后的长期效果同样良好。