Hovinen M, Rasmussen M D, Pyörälä S
Department of Production Animal Medicine, PO Box 57, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Aug;92(8):3696-703. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1962.
Udder health and milk production were monitored in cows transferred from tie stalls or loose housing with conventional milking to loose housing with either automatic or conventional milking. Data were collected from 182 Finnish farms from September 1999 to February 2006. Data from the first year before and first year after the changes were compared. A total of 88 herds changed from conventional milking (CM herds) to automatic milking (AM herds), 29 of which were housed in tie stalls and 59 of which were housed in a loose housing barn before the change. Additionally, 94 CM herds milked in loose housing barns that had been housed in tie stalls before the change were included. Milk record data consisted of annual herd size, parity, breed, calving dates, test day data [date, milk yield, and cow somatic cell count (SCC)] and records for treatments of clinical mastitis. Calculations were made for energy-corrected milk yield and logarithmic SCC (logSCC), proportion of cows at risk that experienced an SCC >200,000 cells/mL for the first time (highSCC), and number of treatments of clinical mastitis within a herd. Cows in tie stalls had higher milk yield (28.5 +/- 0.29 vs. 26.5 +/- 0.46 kg/d) and a lower logSCC (4.86 +/- 0.01 vs. 4.95 +/- 0.02) than cows in loose housing barns before the change. After the change, CM herds had slightly better udder health than AM herds because the proportion of cows at risk for highSCC was larger in AM herds (3.3 vs. 2.1%). The change in milking and housing systems caused a decline of 0.8 +/- 0.25 kg/d per cow in energy-corrected milk yield, a slight increase in cow logSCC (from 4.88 +/- 0.01 to 4.93 +/- 0.01), and an increase of 0.6% in the proportion of cows having highSCC (from 2.5 to 3.1). The impact was clearer on herds that began automatic milking. Based on the results, the increase in bulk milk SCC of herds milked automatically in Finland was probably due to reduced separation of mastitic milk in AM herds.
对从栓系牛舍或传统挤奶方式的散栏牛舍转移至采用自动或传统挤奶方式的散栏牛舍的奶牛,监测其乳房健康状况和产奶量。数据收集于1999年9月至2006年2月期间芬兰的182个农场。对转变前第一年和转变后第一年的数据进行了比较。共有88个牛群从传统挤奶(CM牛群)转变为自动挤奶(AM牛群),其中29个转变前为栓系牛舍,59个转变前为散栏牛舍。此外,还纳入了94个转变前为栓系牛舍、转变后在散栏牛舍进行传统挤奶的CM牛群。牛奶记录数据包括年度牛群规模、胎次、品种、产犊日期、测定日数据[日期、产奶量和奶牛体细胞计数(SCC)]以及临床乳腺炎治疗记录。计算了能量校正产奶量和对数SCC(logSCC)、首次出现SCC>200,000个细胞/毫升的风险奶牛比例(高SCC)以及牛群内临床乳腺炎治疗次数。转变前,栓系牛舍的奶牛产奶量高于散栏牛舍的奶牛(28.5±0.29对26.5±0.46千克/天),logSCC低于散栏牛舍的奶牛(4.86±0.01对4.95±0.02)。转变后,CM牛群的乳房健康状况略好于AM牛群,因为AM牛群中高SCC风险奶牛的比例更大(3.3%对2.1%)。挤奶和牛舍系统的转变导致每头奶牛的能量校正产奶量下降了0.8±0.25千克/天,奶牛logSCC略有增加(从4.88±0.01增至4.93±0.01),高SCC奶牛的比例增加了0.6%(从2.5%增至3.1%)。对开始采用自动挤奶的牛群影响更为明显。基于这些结果,芬兰自动挤奶牛群的原料奶SCC升高可能是由于AM牛群中患乳腺炎奶牛的奶分离减少所致。