Hoffman Jay R, Kraemer William J, Bhasin Shalender, Storer Thomas, Ratamess Nicholas A, Haff G Gregory, Willoughby Darryn S, Rogol Alan D
Department of Health and Exercise Science, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, 08628, USA.
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Aug;23(5 Suppl):S1-S59. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31819df2e6.
Hoffman, JR, Kraemer, WJ, Bhasin, S, Storer, T, Ratamess, NA, Haff, GG, Willoughby, DS, and Rogol, AD. Position stand on Androgen and human growth hormone use. J Strength Cond Res 23(5): S1-S59, 2009-Perceived yet often misunderstood demands of a sport, overt benefits of anabolic drugs, and the inability to be offered any effective alternatives has fueled anabolic drug abuse despite any consequences. Motivational interactions with many situational demands including the desire for improved body image, sport performance, physical function, and body size influence and fuel such negative decisions. Positive countermeasures to deter the abuse of anabolic drugs are complex and yet unclear. Furthermore, anabolic drugs work and the optimized training and nutritional programs needed to cut into the magnitude of improvement mediated by drug abuse require more work, dedication, and preparation on the part of both athletes and coaches alike. Few shortcuts are available to the athlete who desires to train naturally. Historically, the NSCA has placed an emphasis on education to help athletes, coaches, and strength and conditioning professionals become more knowledgeable, highly skilled, and technically trained in their approach to exercise program design and implementation. Optimizing nutritional strategies are a vital interface to help cope with exercise and sport demands (). In addition, research-based supplements will also have to be acknowledged as a strategic set of tools (e.g., protein supplements before and after resistance exercise workout) that can be used in conjunction with optimized nutrition to allow more effective adaptation and recovery from exercise. Resistance exercise is the most effective anabolic form of exercise, and over the past 20 years, the research base for resistance exercise has just started to develop to a significant volume of work to help in the decision-making process in program design (). The interface with nutritional strategies has been less studied, yet may yield even greater benefits to the individual athlete in their attempt to train naturally. Nevertheless, these are the 2 domains that require the most attention when trying to optimize the physical adaptations to exercise training without drug use.Recent surveys indicate that the prevalence of androgen use among adolescents has decreased over the past 10-15 years (). The decrease in androgen use among these students may be attributed to several factors related to education and viable alternatives (i.e., sport supplements) to substitute for illegal drug use. Although success has been achieved in using peer pressure to educate high school athletes on behaviors designed to reduce the intent to use androgens (), it has not had the far-reaching effect desired. It would appear that using the people who have the greatest influence on adolescents (coaches and teachers) be the primary focus of the educational program. It becomes imperative that coaches provide realistic training goals for their athletes and understand the difference between normal physiological adaptation to training or that is pharmaceutically enhanced. Only through a stringent coaching certification program will academic institutions be ensured that coaches that they hire will have the minimal knowledge to provide support to their athletes in helping them make the correct choices regarding sport supplements and performance-enhancing drugs.The NSCA rejects the use of androgens and hGH or any performance-enhancing drugs on the basis of ethics, the ideals of fair play in competition, and concerns for the athlete's health. The NSCA has based this position stand on a critical analysis of the scientific literature evaluating the effects of androgens and human growth hormone on human physiology and performance. The use of anabolic drugs to enhance athletic performance has become a major concern for professional sport organizations, sport governing bodies, and the federal government. It is the belief of the NSCA that through education and research we can mitigate the abuse of androgens and hGH by athletes. Due to the diversity of testosterone-related drugs and molecules, the term androgens is believed to be a more appropriate term for anabolic steroids.
霍夫曼,JR;克雷默,WJ;巴辛,S;斯托勒,T;拉塔梅斯,NA;哈夫,GG;威洛比,DS;罗戈尔,AD。关于雄激素和人生长激素使用的立场声明。《力量与体能研究杂志》23(5): S1 - S59,2009年——尽管存在后果,但对一项运动的认知需求常常被误解、合成代谢药物的明显益处以及无法提供任何有效的替代方法,助长了合成代谢药物的滥用。与许多情境需求的动机互动,包括对改善身体形象、运动表现、身体功能和体型的渴望,影响并推动了这些负面决策。阻止合成代谢药物滥用的积极对策复杂且尚不明确。此外,合成代谢药物确实有效,而要削减药物滥用所带来的改善程度所需的优化训练和营养计划,需要运动员和教练双方付出更多努力、奉献和准备。对于渴望自然训练的运动员来说,捷径寥寥无几。从历史上看,美国国家体能协会一直强调教育,以帮助运动员、教练以及力量与体能专业人员在运动计划设计和实施方法上变得更有见识、技术更熟练且训练有素。优化营养策略是帮助应对运动和体育需求的关键环节()。此外,基于研究的补充剂也必须被视为一套战略性工具(例如,抗阻训练前后的蛋白质补充剂),可与优化营养结合使用,以实现更有效的运动适应和恢复。抗阻训练是最有效的合成代谢运动形式,在过去20年里,抗阻训练的研究基础才刚刚开始发展,形成了大量有助于运动计划设计决策过程的研究成果()。与营养策略的结合研究较少,但可能会给试图自然训练的个体运动员带来更大益处。然而,在试图在不使用药物的情况下优化运动训练的身体适应时,这两个领域是最需要关注的。最近的调查表明,在过去10 - 15年里,青少年中雄激素的使用 prevalence有所下降()。这些学生中雄激素使用的减少可能归因于与教育以及替代非法药物使用的可行替代品(即运动补充剂)相关的几个因素。尽管在利用同伴压力对高中运动员进行旨在减少使用雄激素意图的行为教育方面取得了成功(),但尚未产生预期的深远影响。似乎将对青少年影响最大的人群(教练和教师)作为教育计划的主要重点。教练必须为他们的运动员提供现实的训练目标,并理解正常生理适应训练与药物增强训练之间的区别。只有通过严格的教练认证计划,学术机构才能确保他们雇佣的教练具备最低限度的知识,以便在帮助运动员就运动补充剂和提高成绩的药物做出正确选择方面为他们提供支持。美国国家体能协会基于伦理道德以及竞争中公平竞赛的理念,并出于对运动员健康的担忧,反对使用雄激素、人生长激素或任何提高成绩的药物。美国国家体能协会基于对评估雄激素和人生长激素对人体生理和表现影响的科学文献的批判性分析,确立了这一立场声明。使用合成代谢药物来提高运动成绩已成为职业体育组织、体育管理机构和联邦政府的主要关注点。美国国家体能协会认为,通过教育和研究,我们可以减少运动员对雄激素和人生长激素的滥用。由于与睾酮相关的药物和分子种类繁多,“雄激素”一词被认为是合成代谢类固醇更合适的术语。