Peñate Wenceslao, Perestelo Lilisbeth, Bethencourt Juan M, Ramirez Gustavo
Universidad de La Laguna, Servicio de Evaluación del Servicio Canario de la Salud, Facultad de Psicología, Tenerife, Spain.
Psicothema. 2009 Aug;21(3):341-6.
Several models have been proposed to explain the depressive phenomenon, such as the theory of dysfunctional attitudes, the hopelessness theory, the behavioral model of activity level, or temperamental models. This article presents data about the role of those models in the prediction of the level of depression in a sample of 414 college students, assessed over a temporal interval of six months. Dysfunctional attitudes, attributional styles, the level of activity, and the five-factors of personality were assessed. The BDI-II was the depression level measure. The results showed that these variables predict depression levels, but with low coefficients. The dimensions of Need of Achievement (a dysfunctional attitude) and Neuroticism had particularly greater weight in the prediction, but only Neuroticism seems to behave like a vulnerability element. Attributional styles did not contribute significantly to the prediction of depression. Activity level lost its predictive role during the 6-month interval. These results are discussed according to the role of the proposed models and the need for a deeper explanation of the variance of depression scores.
已经提出了几种模型来解释抑郁现象,比如功能失调性态度理论、绝望理论、活动水平行为模型或气质模型。本文呈现了关于这些模型在预测414名大学生样本抑郁水平方面作用的数据,这些学生在六个月的时间间隔内接受了评估。评估了功能失调性态度、归因方式、活动水平和人格五因素。贝克抑郁自评量表第二版(BDI-II)是抑郁水平的测量工具。结果表明,这些变量可以预测抑郁水平,但系数较低。成就需求(一种功能失调性态度)维度和神经质在预测中权重尤其更大,但只有神经质似乎表现为一个易损因素。归因方式对抑郁预测没有显著贡献。在6个月的时间间隔内,活动水平失去了其预测作用。根据所提出模型的作用以及对抑郁得分差异进行更深入解释的必要性对这些结果进行了讨论。