Centre de Neurosciences Intégratives et Cognitives, Université de Bordeaux, Talence, France.
Hippocampus. 2010 Jun;20(6):745-57. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20680.
The hippocampal somatostatin (sst) receptor subtype 4 (sst(4)) modulates memory formation by diminishing hippocampus-based spatial function while enhancing striatum-dependent behaviors. sst(4)-mediated regulations on neuronal activity in the hippocampus appear to depend on both competitive and cooperative interactions with sst receptor subtype 2 (sst(2)). Here, we investigated whether interactions with sst(2) receptors are required for sst(4)-mediated effects on hippocampus-dependent spatial memory and striatum-dependent cued memory in a water maze paradigm. Competition was assessed in mice by intrahippocampal injections of the sst(4) agonist L-803,087 alone or combined with sst(2) agonists (L-779,976 or octreotide). Effects of L-803,087 were also tested in sst(2) knockout mice to assess for receptor cooperation. Finally, sst(2a) and sst(4) localizations within hippocampal subregions were analyzed by immunohistochemistry and expression levels of sst(2a) and sst(2b) were quantified by real-time qPCR. Hippocampal injections of L-803,087 impaired spatial memory but enhanced cued memory. The latter effect was lost not only in sst(2) knockout mice but also in the presence of sst(2) agonists, whereas the former effect remained unaffected by sst(2) agonists or gene deletion. Octreotide and L-779,976 did not yield memory effects but reduced swim velocity throughout the acquisition trials suggesting that stimulation of sst(2) affected motivation and/or anxiety. sst(2a) and sst(4) were respectively detected in the dentate gyrus (DG) and the CA1 subfield suggesting that their functional interactions are not mediated by direct receptor coupling. Hippocampus sst(2a) expression was 36-fold higher than sst(2b). Possible neural mechanisms and functional significances for interaction between memory systems in relationship with stress-induced changes in hippocampal functions are discussed.
海马生长抑素 (sst) 受体亚型 4 (sst(4)) 通过减弱基于海马的空间功能,同时增强纹状体依赖的行为来调节记忆形成。sst(4) 对海马神经元活动的调节似乎既依赖于与 sst 受体亚型 2 (sst(2)) 的竞争和合作相互作用。在这里,我们研究了在水迷宫范式中,sst(4) 介导的对海马依赖空间记忆和纹状体依赖提示记忆的影响是否需要与 sst(2) 受体的相互作用。在小鼠中通过海马内注射 sst(4) 激动剂 L-803,087 单独或与 sst(2) 激动剂 (L-779,976 或奥曲肽) 联合来评估竞争。还在 sst(2) 敲除小鼠中测试了 L-803,087 的作用,以评估受体合作。最后,通过免疫组织化学分析海马亚区的 sst(2a) 和 sst(4) 定位,并通过实时 qPCR 定量 sst(2a) 和 sst(2b) 的表达水平。海马内注射 L-803,087 损害空间记忆,但增强提示记忆。后一种效应不仅在 sst(2) 敲除小鼠中消失,而且在 sst(2) 激动剂存在下也消失,而前一种效应不受 sst(2) 激动剂或基因缺失的影响。奥曲肽和 L-779,976 没有产生记忆效应,但在整个获得试验中降低了游泳速度,这表明 sst(2) 的刺激影响了动机和/或焦虑。sst(2a) 和 sst(4) 分别在齿状回 (DG) 和 CA1 亚区中被检测到,这表明它们的功能相互作用不是通过直接受体偶联介导的。海马 sst(2a) 的表达比 sst(2b) 高 36 倍。讨论了与应激引起的海马功能变化有关的记忆系统之间相互作用的可能神经机制和功能意义。