Jaspers Karolien, Aerts Hugo J W L, Leiner Tim, Oostendorp Marlies, van Riel Natal A W, Post Mark J, Backes Walter H
Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Magn Reson Med. 2009 Sep;62(3):779-87. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22035.
Current clinical applications of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) are based on the extravasation of relatively small contrast agents (SCAs). SCAs are considered disadvantageous, as they require high image sampling rates. Medium-sized contrast agents (MCAs) leak more slowly into tissue and allow longer dynamic acquisition times, enabling improved image quality. The influence of molecular size on the reliability of pharmacokinetic parameters, including the transfer constant K(trans), was investigated. Computer simulations were performed, with in vivo measured arterial input functions (AIFs), to determine the bias and variance of pharmacokinetic parameters as a function of contrast agent size, sampling frequency, noise level, and acquisition time. Better reliability of all parameters was obtained for the MCA compared to the SCA. To obtain similar variance (10%) in K(trans), the sampling frequency for the SCA (28 min(-1)) had to be 20 times faster than for the MCA (1.3 min(-1)). Optimal reliability in parameter estimation required longer acquisition times for MCAs (13 min for the fraction of the extravascular extracellular space into which the contrast agent distributes (v(e)) and 5 min for K(trans)) than for SCAs (1.7 min for K(trans) and v(e)). Reliable estimation of the fractional blood plasma volume (v(p)) was only achieved with MCAs. In conclusion, MCAs provided superior reliability for pharmacokinetic parameter estimation compared to SCAs.
动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)目前的临床应用基于相对较小的对比剂(SCAs)的外渗。SCAs被认为存在劣势,因为它们需要高图像采样率。中等大小的对比剂(MCAs)向组织内渗漏的速度更慢,允许更长的动态采集时间,从而提高图像质量。研究了分子大小对药代动力学参数可靠性的影响,包括转运常数K(trans)。利用体内测量的动脉输入函数(AIFs)进行计算机模拟,以确定药代动力学参数的偏差和方差作为对比剂大小、采样频率、噪声水平和采集时间的函数。与SCA相比,MCA的所有参数具有更好的可靠性。为了在K(trans)中获得相似的方差(10%),SCA的采样频率(28 min⁻¹)必须比MCA的采样频率(1.3 min⁻¹)快20倍。与SCA(K(trans)和血管外细胞外间隙分数(v(e))为1.7 min)相比,MCA在参数估计中获得最佳可靠性所需的采集时间更长(v(e)为13 min,K(trans)为5 min)。仅使用MCA才能可靠估计血浆分数体积(v(p))。总之,与SCA相比,MCA在药代动力学参数估计方面具有更高的可靠性。