• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非转移性 pT3 期肾肿瘤患者的生存:腹腔镜与开放性根治性肾切除术的匹配比较。

Survival of patients with nonmetastatic pT3 renal tumours: a matched comparison of laparoscopic vs open radical nephrectomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Mondor Hospital, Paris, France.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2009 Dec;104(11):1714-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08662.x. Epub 2009 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08662.x
PMID:19624536
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the oncological outcome of patients with pT3 renal tumours treated either by laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) or open RN (ORN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a retrospective review of a multi-institutional database, we identified 1003 patients with a T3N0M0 renal tumour and with no vena caval invasion. Sixty-five patients treated by LRN were matched with up to four patients treated by ORN. Exact matches were made for age, gender, tumour size, perirenal fat invasion, renal vein invasion, and histological subtype. Following the matching process there were 44 patients treated by LRN and 135 by ORN. Qualitative and continuous variables were compared using chi-square and independent-sample t-tests, respectively. Differences in survival were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox regression model was used to test the effect of variables on survival.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable for age (P = 0.4), gender, tumour size (P = 0.4), tumour grade (P = 0.25) and histological subtype (P = 0.45). The mean follow-up was longer in the ORN group (55 vs 28 months, P < 0.001). There was no difference in survival between the ORN and LRN groups in the whole T3 population (P = 0.7), in those with perirenal fat invasion (P = 0.9), or in the subset with renal vein invasion (P = 0.31). In univariate analysis, the only predictor for death from cancer was tumour grade (P = 0.05). In multivariate analysis, no variable was significantly associated with cancer survival.

CONCLUSIONS

LRN has no adverse effect on cancer survival compared to ORN in patients with microscopic T3 renal cancer. Additional prospective evaluation is warranted.

摘要

目的

比较接受腹腔镜根治性肾切除术(LRN)或开放性肾切除术(ORN)治疗的 pT3 肾肿瘤患者的肿瘤学结果。

患者和方法

在对多机构数据库的回顾性研究中,我们确定了 1003 例 T3N0M0 肾肿瘤且无下腔静脉侵犯的患者。对 65 例接受 LRN 治疗的患者进行了多达 4 例接受 ORN 治疗的患者的匹配。对年龄、性别、肿瘤大小、肾周脂肪浸润、肾静脉浸润和组织学亚型进行精确匹配。匹配后,有 44 例接受 LRN 治疗,135 例接受 ORN 治疗。使用卡方检验和独立样本 t 检验分别比较定性和连续变量。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法比较生存差异。使用 Cox 回归模型检验变量对生存的影响。

结果

两组患者的年龄(P = 0.4)、性别、肿瘤大小(P = 0.4)、肿瘤分级(P = 0.25)和组织学亚型(P = 0.45)相似。ORN 组的平均随访时间较长(55 比 28 个月,P < 0.001)。在整个 T3 人群中,ORN 和 LRN 组之间的生存率没有差异(P = 0.7),在肾周脂肪浸润患者中(P = 0.9),或在肾静脉侵犯患者亚组中(P = 0.31)也没有差异。单因素分析显示,唯一与癌症死亡相关的预测因素是肿瘤分级(P = 0.05)。多因素分析显示,没有变量与癌症生存显著相关。

结论

与 ORN 相比,LRN 对显微镜下 T3 肾肿瘤患者的癌症生存率没有不良影响。需要进一步的前瞻性评估。

相似文献

1
Survival of patients with nonmetastatic pT3 renal tumours: a matched comparison of laparoscopic vs open radical nephrectomy.非转移性 pT3 期肾肿瘤患者的生存:腹腔镜与开放性根治性肾切除术的匹配比较。
BJU Int. 2009 Dec;104(11):1714-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08662.x. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
2
Seven years after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: oncologic and renal functional outcomes.腹腔镜根治性肾切除术后七年:肿瘤学及肾功能结果
Urology. 2008 Jun;71(6):1149-54. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.081. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
3
Laparoscopic radical versus partial nephrectomy for tumors >4 cm: intermediate-term oncologic and functional outcomes.腹腔镜根治性肾切除术与部分肾切除术治疗直径>4 cm肿瘤的中期肿瘤学及功能结局
Urology. 2009 May;73(5):1077-82. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.11.059.
4
Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients.腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术:200例配对患者的比较
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1171-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.042. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
5
The operative safety and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic nephrectomy for T3 renal cell cancer.腹腔镜肾切除术治疗 T3 期肾细胞癌的手术安全性和肿瘤学结果。
BJU Int. 2012 Sep;110(6):884-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10850.x. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
6
The relationship of postoperative complications with in-hospital outcomes and costs after renal surgery for kidney cancer.肾细胞癌患者术后并发症与住院结局和费用的关系。
BJU Int. 2013 Apr;111(4):580-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11122.x. Epub 2012 May 7.
7
Prognostic value of renal vein and inferior vena cava involvement in renal cell carcinoma.肾静脉及下腔静脉受累在肾细胞癌中的预后价值
Eur Urol. 2009 Feb;55(2):452-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.053. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
8
Nephrectomy improves the survival of patients with locally advanced renal cell carcinoma.肾切除术可提高局部晚期肾细胞癌患者的生存率。
BJU Int. 2008 Dec;102(11):1610-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07917.x. Epub 2008 Aug 14.
9
A new staging system for locally advanced (pT3-4) renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter European study including 2,000 patients.局部进展期(pT3 - 4)肾细胞癌的一种新分期系统:一项纳入2000例患者的欧洲多中心研究。
J Urol. 2007 Aug;178(2):418-24; discussion 423-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.104. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
10
Long-term followup after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.腹腔镜根治性肾切除术后的长期随访
J Urol. 2002 Mar;167(3):1257-62.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Hybrid Surgical Technique for Large Renal Masses-Hybrid Technique of Laparoscopic-Assisted Open Radical Nephrectomy.一种用于大型肾肿物的新型混合手术技术——腹腔镜辅助开放性根治性肾切除术的混合技术
Urol Res Pract. 2025 Jul 29;51(4):131-135. doi: 10.5152/tud.2025.24090.
2
Oncologic and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for the treatment of renal tumor (> 7 cm): a systematic review and pooled analysis of comparative outcomes.腹腔镜与开放根治性肾切除术治疗肾肿瘤(> 7 cm)的肿瘤学和围手术期结果:系统评价和比较结果的汇总分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Feb 6;21(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-02916-y.
3
Minimally invasive radical nephrectomy: a contemporary review.
微创根治性肾切除术:当代综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Dec;9(6):3112-3122. doi: 10.21037/tau-2019-suc-16.
4
Comparison of Laparoscopy and Open Radical Nephrectomy of Renal Cell Cancer.腹腔镜与开放性肾癌根治性肾切除术的比较
Open Med (Wars). 2019 May 17;14:392-397. doi: 10.1515/med-2019-0040. eCollection 2019.
5
Laparoscopic renal surgery is here to stay.腹腔镜肾手术已成为一种常用的手术方式。
Arab J Urol. 2018 Mar 6;16(3):314-320. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2018.01.003. eCollection 2018 Sep.
6
Evaluating the perioperative safety of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large, non-metastatic renal tumours: a comparative analysis of T1-T2 with T3a tumours.评估腹腔镜根治性肾切除术治疗大型、非转移性肾肿瘤的围手术期安全性:T1-T2期与T3a期肿瘤的对比分析
Ir J Med Sci. 2018 May;187(2):313-318. doi: 10.1007/s11845-017-1652-6. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
7
Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜与开放根治性肾切除术治疗肾细胞癌:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Transl Oncol. 2017 Aug;10(4):501-510. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 May 24.
8
Minimally invasive cytoreductive nephrectomy: a multi-institutional experience.微创减瘤性肾切除术:多机构经验
World J Urol. 2016 Dec;34(12):1651-1656. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1827-1. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
9
Clinical outcomes following laparoscopic management of pT3 renal masses: A large, multi-institutional cohort.腹腔镜治疗pT3期肾肿块后的临床结局:一项大型多机构队列研究。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Nov-Dec;9(11-12):397-402. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2848. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
10
Matched pair analysis of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for the treatment of T3 renal cell carcinoma.腹腔镜与开放性根治性肾切除术治疗T3期肾细胞癌的配对分析
World J Urol. 2015 Jan;33(1):25-32. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1280-y. Epub 2014 Mar 20.