Suppr超能文献

结肠癌筛查的成本效益

Cost-effectiveness of colon cancer screening.

作者信息

Lieberman D

机构信息

VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 1991 Dec;86(12):1789-94.

PMID:1962624
Abstract

The cost-effectiveness of two colon cancer-screening strategies was compared. The first strategy mirrors the recommendations of the American Cancer Society and includes sigmoidoscopy starting at age 50, and yearly fecal occult blood testing. The second strategy is screening with colonoscopy. The analysis revealed that the 10-yr cost of screening with sigmoidoscopy is nearly $1,700, compared with nearly $2,500 for colonoscopy, using prevailing procedure costs. This difference can be reduced by lowering the cost of normal colonoscopies. The cost of identifying one patient with an adenomatous polyp is $8,766 with sigmoidoscopy, compared to $5,988 with colonoscopy because of the higher detection rate with colonoscopy. The calculated cost of preventing one death from colon cancer is $444,133 with sigmoidoscopy versus $347,214 with colonoscopy. In conclusion, colon cancer prevention with current screening methods is very costly. Screening with sigmoidoscopy and fecal occult blood testing may not be cost-effective, compared to screening with colonoscopy.

摘要

对两种结肠癌筛查策略的成本效益进行了比较。第一种策略借鉴了美国癌症协会的建议,包括从50岁开始进行乙状结肠镜检查以及每年进行粪便潜血检测。第二种策略是使用结肠镜进行筛查。分析显示,按照现行的检查费用,采用乙状结肠镜检查进行10年筛查的成本接近1700美元,而结肠镜检查则接近2500美元。降低正常结肠镜检查的成本可以缩小这一差距。通过乙状结肠镜检查发现一名患有腺瘤性息肉患者的成本为8766美元,而结肠镜检查为5988美元,因为结肠镜检查的检出率更高。计算得出,采用乙状结肠镜检查预防一例结肠癌死亡的成本为444133美元,而结肠镜检查为347214美元。总之,采用当前筛查方法预防结肠癌的成本非常高。与结肠镜检查相比,乙状结肠镜检查和粪便潜血检测可能不具有成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验