Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Nov;107(2):107-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.05.027. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
To evaluate the risk factors for positive margins in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 3 and the outcomes of postconization management.
A retrospective review of the records of 1113 women who underwent conization for CIN 3 between 2000 and 2008.
Positive margins occurred in the following: 104 (10.7%) women with severe dysplasia versus 37 (26.2%) with carcinoma in situ; 32 (4.8%) treated with cold knife conization versus 109 (24.1%) treated with the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP); and 124 (11.6%) premenopausal versus 17 (35.4%) postmenopausal women. None of the women with severe dysplasia had invasive disease in the repeat excision specimen, whereas 3 (8.6%) women with carcinoma in situ had residual microinvasive carcinoma.
LEEP, carcinoma in situ, menopausal status, and larger area of lesion are risk factors for positive margins. For women with CIN 3 and positive margins, follow-up at an interval of 6 months or repeat excision are treatment options. However, when repeat excision is technically impossible, whether simple hysterectomy or radical surgery is a rational treatment option requires further investigation.
评估宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)3 级切缘阳性的危险因素及锥切术后的处理结局。
回顾性分析 2000 年至 2008 年间 1113 例行 CIN3 锥切术患者的临床资料。
切缘阳性的相关因素包括:重度异型增生 104 例(10.7%)与原位腺癌 37 例(26.2%);冷刀锥切 32 例(4.8%)与环形电切术(LEEP)109 例(24.1%);未绝经 124 例(11.6%)与绝经后 17 例(35.4%)。重度异型增生患者的再次切缘阴性中未见浸润性病变,而原位腺癌患者中 3 例(8.6%)有残留微小浸润癌。
LEEP、原位腺癌、绝经状态及病变范围大是切缘阳性的危险因素。CIN3 且切缘阳性患者可行密切随访或再次锥切,但若再次锥切无法实施,是否行单纯子宫切除术或根治性手术则需要进一步研究。