Roberts Patricia M, Meltzer Ann, Wilding Joanne
University of Ottawa, Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, 451 Smyth Road, Room 3071, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada.
J Commun Disord. 2009 Nov-Dec;42(6):414-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.06.001. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
Data on disfluencies in the speech of non-stuttering adults are relevant to several aspects of the assessment and treatment of adults who stutter. Currently, very few sources provide relevant data. In the existing literature on normally fluent speakers, there is no consistency in sample length or topic or in which types of disfluency are counted. Many studies report incomplete data, making it difficult to compare new results to previous ones. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of sample length and topic on fluency levels in the speech of non-stuttering adult men. Monologues produced by 25 English-speaking men with no reported communication disorder were analyzed for the presence of disfluencies. The group means for total disfluencies were between 6 and 8 per 100 syllables for all samples. A within-subjects Length (3) by Topic (3) ANOVA found a significant interaction (Length by Topic), however, the clinical importance of this result is minimal. The mean number of within-word disfluencies (also called stuttering-like disfluencies or SLDs) was below 1.5 per 100 syllables for all samples, although there was some variation across individual speakers. The data presented will be useful to clinicians and to researchers interested in disfluencies in spontaneous speech.
Readers will be able to (1) identify several methodological problems in studies of disfluency including counting methods and descriptions of participants; (2) identify the range of within-word disfluencies (also called SLDs) and other disfluencies in this study and other similar ones; (3) know whether topic/type of speech or sample length is more likely to affect disfluency levels in non-stuttering adults.
非口吃成年人口语中言语不流畅的数据与口吃成年人的评估和治疗的多个方面相关。目前,很少有资料提供相关数据。在现有的关于正常流利说话者的文献中,样本长度、主题或所统计的不流畅类型都不一致。许多研究报告的数据不完整,使得难以将新结果与先前结果进行比较。本研究的目的是评估样本长度和主题对非口吃成年男性口语流利程度的影响。对25名未报告有沟通障碍的英语男性所产生的独白进行分析,以确定是否存在言语不流畅。所有样本中每100个音节的总言语不流畅的组均值在6到8之间。一项被试内长度(3)×主题(3)的方差分析发现了显著的交互作用(长度×主题),然而,这一结果的临床重要性极小。所有样本中每100个音节的词内言语不流畅(也称为口吃样言语不流畅或SLD)的平均数低于1.5,尽管个体说话者之间存在一些差异。所呈现的数据将对临床医生和对自发口语中的言语不流畅感兴趣的研究人员有用。
读者将能够(1)识别言语不流畅研究中的几个方法学问题,包括计数方法和参与者描述;(2)识别本研究及其他类似研究中词内言语不流畅(也称为SLD)和其他言语不流畅的范围;(3)了解主题/言语类型或样本长度是否更有可能影响非口吃成年人的言语不流畅水平。