Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, Catholic University, Campobasso, Italy.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010 Mar;36(3):298-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.06.009. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
To investigate the differences of the amount of paracervical lymphatic structures removed when performing classical type III, modified type II and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (RH).
Open macroscopic or laparoscopic pelvic dissections in 18 fresh adult female cadavers after lymphatic channels and nodes staining by Lipiodol dye solution injection of the uterine cervix.
We distinguished three different lymphatic pathways: 1) the supraureteral paracervical pathway (vascular portion of paracervix-uterine artery and superficial uterine vein), identified in 96% of cases, and removed in all types of RH, 2) the infraureteral paracervical pathway (vascular portion of paracervix-deep uterine vein), identified in 22% of cases, and removed by type III and nerve-sparing RH, and 3) the neural paracervical pathway (nervous portion of paracervix), identified in 7% of cases, and removable only by type III RH. No evidence of stained lymphatic structures running into the vesicouterine and uterosacral ligaments was found.
Nerve-sparing RH offers the most effective ratio between oncological safety and surgical-related complications, and would be particularly useful in patients with high risk of paracervical involvement while our results suggest caution in the use of modified type II RH in patients at low-moderate risk of paracervical involvement, unless the use of adjuvant radiotherapy, because of the large amount of potentially lymph-bearing paracervical tissue leaved in situ. Classical type III RH affords the complete resection of all paracervical lymphatic pathways potentially draining the cervix, however this procedure implies a high risk of lesions of the autonomous nerves of pelvic organs.
探讨行经典型 III 式、改良型 II 式和保留神经的根治性子宫切除术(RH)时,切除子宫颈旁淋巴结构的数量差异。
对 18 具新鲜成年女性尸体进行经宫颈注射碘油溶液后行开放宏观或腹腔镜盆腔解剖,以显示淋巴通道和淋巴结。
我们区分了三种不同的淋巴途径:1)输尿管上方子宫颈旁途径(子宫旁血管部分-子宫动脉和子宫浅静脉),在 96%的病例中存在,并在所有类型的 RH 中切除,2)输尿管下方子宫颈旁途径(子宫旁血管部分-子宫深静脉),在 22%的病例中存在,并由 III 式和保留神经的 RH 切除,3)神经子宫颈旁途径(子宫旁神经部分),在 7%的病例中存在,仅由 III 式 RH 切除。没有证据表明染色的淋巴结构进入膀胱子宫和子宫骶骨韧带。
保留神经的 RH 提供了在肿瘤安全性和手术相关并发症之间的最佳比例,对于高危子宫颈旁受累的患者尤其有用,而我们的结果表明,在中低危子宫颈旁受累的患者中,除非使用辅助放疗,否则应谨慎使用改良型 II 式 RH,因为大量潜在带淋巴的子宫颈旁组织原位保留。经典型 III 式 RH 可完全切除所有可能引流子宫颈的子宫颈旁淋巴途径,但这一过程会增加骨盆自主神经损伤的风险。