Penno Megan A S, Ernst Matthias, Hoffmann Peter
Adelaide Proteomics Centre, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2009 Sep;23(17):2656-62. doi: 10.1002/rcm.4167.
Mass spectrometry (MS) profiling of the proteome and peptidome for disease-associated patterns is a new concept in clinical diagnostics. The technique, however, is highly sensitive to external sources of variation leading to potentially unacceptable numbers of false positive and false negative results. Before MS profiling can be confidently implemented in a medical setting, standard experimental methods must be developed that minimize technical variance. Past studies of variance have focused largely on pre-analytical variation (i.e., sample collection, handling, etc.). Here, we examined how factors at the analytical stage including the matrix and solid-phase extraction influence MS profiling. Firstly, a standard peptide/protein sample was measured automatically by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) MS across five consecutive days using two different preparation methods, dried droplet and sample/matrix, of four types of matrix: alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (HCCA), sinapinic acid (SA), 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB) and 2,5-dihydroxyacetophenone (DHAP). The results indicated that the matrix preparation greatly influenced a number of key parameters of the spectra including repeatability (within-day variability), reproducibility (inter-day variability), resolution, signal strength, background intensity and detectability. Secondly, an investigation into the variance associated with C8 magnetic bead extraction of the standard sample prior to automated MS profiling demonstrated that the process did not adversely affect these same parameters. In fact, the spectra were generally more robust following extraction. Thirdly, the best performing matrix preparations were evaluated using C8 magnetic bead extracted human plasma. We conclude that the DHAP prepared according to the dried-droplet method is the most appropriate matrix to use when performing automated MS profiling.
对蛋白质组和肽组进行质谱(MS)分析以寻找疾病相关模式是临床诊断中的一个新概念。然而,该技术对外部变异源高度敏感,可能导致数量不可接受的假阳性和假阴性结果。在质谱分析能够在医疗环境中可靠实施之前,必须开发出将技术差异降至最低的标准实验方法。过去对差异的研究主要集中在分析前的变异(即样本采集、处理等)。在这里,我们研究了分析阶段的因素,包括基质和固相萃取,如何影响质谱分析。首先,使用两种不同的制备方法(干滴法和样品/基质法),对四种类型的基质(α-氰基-4-羟基肉桂酸(HCCA)、芥子酸(SA)、2,5-二羟基苯甲酸(DHB)和2,5-二羟基苯乙酮(DHAP)),通过基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间(MALDI-TOF)质谱仪连续五天自动测量标准肽/蛋白质样品。结果表明,基质制备对光谱的许多关键参数有很大影响,包括重复性(日内变异性)、再现性(日间变异性)、分辨率、信号强度、背景强度和可检测性。其次,在自动质谱分析之前,对标准样品进行C8磁珠萃取相关差异的研究表明,该过程不会对这些相同参数产生不利影响。事实上,萃取后的光谱通常更稳定。第三,使用C8磁珠萃取的人血浆评估了性能最佳的基质制备方法。我们得出结论,在进行自动质谱分析时,根据干滴法制备的DHAP是最合适使用的基质。