Suppr超能文献

采前食品安全干预措施临床试验报告质量与治疗效果的关系。

Quality of reporting in clinical trials of preharvest food safety interventions and associations with treatment effect.

机构信息

Centre for Public Health and Zoonoses, University of Guelph, Guelph N1G 2W1, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2009 Oct;6(8):989-99. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2009.0321.

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating treatment efficacy. Therefore, it is important that RCTs are conducted with methodological rigor to prevent biased results and report results in a manner that allows the reader to evaluate internal and external validity. Most human health journals now require manuscripts to meet the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) criteria for reporting of RCTs. Our objective was to evaluate preharvest food safety trials using a modification of the CONSORT criteria to assess methodological quality and completeness of reporting, and to investigate associations between reporting and treatment effects. One hundred randomly selected trials were evaluated using a modified CONSORT statement. The majority of the selected trials (84%) used a deliberate disease challenge, with the remainder representing natural pathogen exposure. There were widespread deficiencies in the reporting of many trial features. Randomization, double blinding, and the number of subjects lost to follow-up were reported in only 46%, 0%, and 43% of trials, respectively. The inclusion criteria for study subjects were only described in 16% of trials, and the number of animals housed together was only stated in 52% of the trials. Although 91 trials had more than one outcome, no trials specified the primary outcome of interest. There were significant bivariable associations between the proportion of positive treatment effects and failure to report the number of subjects lost to follow-up, the number of animals housed together in a group, the level of treatment allocation, and possible study limitations. The results suggest that there are substantive deficiencies in reporting of preharvest food safety trials, and that these deficiencies may be associated with biased treatment effects. The creation and adoption of standards for reporting in preharvest food safety trials will help to ensure the inclusion of important trial details in all publications.

摘要

随机对照试验(RCTs)是评估治疗效果的金标准。因此,重要的是要以严格的方法学标准进行 RCT,以防止产生有偏差的结果,并以允许读者评估内部和外部有效性的方式报告结果。现在,大多数人类健康期刊都要求手稿符合 CONSORT(CONsolidated Standards of Reporting Trials)报告 RCT 的标准。我们的目的是使用 CONSORT 标准的修改版评估采前食品安全试验,以评估方法学质量和报告的完整性,并研究报告与治疗效果之间的关系。使用修改后的 CONSORT 声明评估了 100 项随机试验。选择的试验中大多数(84%)使用了蓄意疾病挑战,其余的则代表了自然病原体暴露。许多试验特征的报告存在广泛的缺陷。仅在 46%、0%和 43%的试验中分别报告了随机化、双盲和随访丢失的受试者数量。仅有 16%的试验描述了研究对象的纳入标准,只有 52%的试验说明了一起饲养的动物数量。尽管有 91 项试验有一个以上的结果,但没有一项试验指定了感兴趣的主要结果。阳性治疗效果的比例与未报告随访丢失的受试者数量、一组中一起饲养的动物数量、治疗分配水平以及可能存在的研究局限性之间存在显著的双变量关联。结果表明,采前食品安全试验的报告存在实质性缺陷,这些缺陷可能与治疗效果有偏差有关。制定和采用采前食品安全试验报告标准将有助于确保所有出版物都包含重要的试验细节。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验