Chapman Kathy, Kelly Bridget, King Lesley
Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2009 Jun;33(3):253-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00384.x.
Research in the field of food marketing to children requires a better understanding of the research gaps in order to inform policy development. The purpose of this paper was to propose a framework for classifying food marketing research, using Australian research on food marketing to children to demonstrate how this framework can be used to determine knowledge gaps.
A literature review of research databases and 'grey' material was conducted to identify research from the previous 10 years. Studies were classified according to their research focus, and media type, as either: exposure, including content analyses; effects of exposure, including opinions, attitudes and actions resulting from food marketing exposure; regulations, including the type and level of regulation that applies to food marketing; or breaches of regulations, including instances where marketing regulations have been violated.
The majority of Australian research on food marketing to children has focused on television advertising and exposure research. Research has consistently shown that the content of food marketing directed at children is predominately for unhealthy foods. There is a lack of research on the effects of food marketing, which would be valuable to inform policy.
The development of a logical framework for food marketing research allows for the identification of research gaps and enables research priorities to be identified.
儿童食品营销领域的研究需要更好地理解研究空白,以便为政策制定提供信息。本文的目的是提出一个食品营销研究分类框架,并利用澳大利亚针对儿童的食品营销研究来展示该框架如何用于确定知识空白。
对研究数据库和“灰色”资料进行文献综述,以识别过去10年的研究。研究根据其研究重点和媒体类型分为以下几类:接触,包括内容分析;接触的影响,包括食品营销接触导致的意见、态度和行为;监管,包括适用于食品营销的监管类型和水平;或违规行为,包括违反营销法规的情况。
澳大利亚大多数针对儿童的食品营销研究都集中在电视广告和接触研究上。研究一直表明,针对儿童的食品营销内容主要是针对不健康食品的。缺乏关于食品营销影响的研究,而这对政策制定很有价值。
食品营销研究逻辑框架的发展有助于识别研究空白,并确定研究重点。