Vijayakumar K N, Gunasekaran K, Sahu S S, Jambulingam P
Vector Control Research Centre (ICMR), Medical Complex, Indira Nagar, Pondicherry 605006, India.
Acta Trop. 2009 Nov;112(2):137-42. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.07.011. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
Local knowledge and practice related to malaria is important for the implementation of culturally appropriate, sustainable and effective interventions. In this context, to know people's knowledge, attitude and practice on malaria and its prevention, a study was carried out in two districts viz., Malkangiri and Koraput of Orissa state in India, the former with ongoing insecticide treated mosquito nets (ITNs) programme and the latter without such programme (non-ITNs). Both qualitative and quantitative methods were used for data collection. The local concepts used for malaria describe only the biomedical symptoms of the disease although a few by meaning in local language reflect people's misconceptions about the cause of malaria. About 63% of the respondents mentioned mosquito bite as the cause for this disease and 65% considered malaria as a serious problem. Qualitative data showed that people from remote villages seek treatment from traditional healers, Disharis. About 64% of the respondents stated that avoiding mosquito bites could prevent malaria. Majority (99%) of the people reported using personal protection measures to avoid mosquito bites. Although, majority of the people were aware of the cause and prevention of malaria (about 70% stated sleeping under mosquito net prevents malaria), a sizable proportion still had misconceptions and hence appropriate communication strategies should be developed and imparted alongside ITNs/LLINs distribution for a behaviour change to adopt such preventive measures. Since, the tribes are habituated to seek treatment from traditional healers; they could be involved in motivating people to use ITNs/LLINs to protect from mosquito bites and malaria.
与疟疾相关的当地知识和实践对于实施符合文化习俗、可持续且有效的干预措施至关重要。在此背景下,为了解人们对疟疾及其预防的知识、态度和实践,在印度奥里萨邦的两个地区——马尔康吉里和科拉普特开展了一项研究,前者正在实施用杀虫剂处理过的蚊帐(ITNs)项目,后者没有此类项目(非ITNs地区)。数据收集采用了定性和定量方法。用于描述疟疾的当地概念仅涉及该疾病的生物医学症状,尽管少数当地语言中的含义反映了人们对疟疾病因的误解。约63%的受访者提到蚊虫叮咬是该疾病的病因,65%的人认为疟疾是一个严重问题。定性数据表明,来自偏远村庄的人们会向传统治疗师迪沙里斯寻求治疗。约64%的受访者表示避免蚊虫叮咬可以预防疟疾。大多数人(99%)报告称采取了个人防护措施来避免蚊虫叮咬。尽管大多数人了解疟疾的病因和预防方法(约70%的人表示睡在蚊帐下可预防疟疾),但仍有相当一部分人存在误解,因此应制定并实施适当的沟通策略,同时分发ITNs/长效驱虫蚊帐(LLINs),以促使人们改变行为,采取此类预防措施。由于部落习惯向传统治疗师寻求治疗,他们可参与激励人们使用ITNs/LLINs来防止蚊虫叮咬和预防疟疾。