Almécija Sergio, Alba David M, Moyà-Solà Salvador
Institut Català de Paleontologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Edifici ICP, Campus de la UAB s/n, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain.
J Hum Evol. 2009 Sep;57(3):284-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.02.008. Epub 2009 Jul 24.
The partial skeleton of Pierolapithecus, which provides the oldest unequivocal evidence of orthogrady, together with the recently described phalanges from Paşalar most likely attributable to Griphopithecus, provide a unique opportunity for understanding the changes in hand anatomy during the pronogrady/orthogrady transition in hominoid evolution. In this paper, we describe the Pierolapithecus hand phalanges and compare their morphology and proportions with those of other Miocene apes in order to make paleobiological inferences about locomotor evolution. In particular, we investigate the orthograde/pronograde evolutionary transition in order to test whether the acquisition of vertical climbing and suspension were decoupled during evolution. Our results indicate that the manual phalanges of Miocene apes are much more similar to one another than to living apes. In particular, Miocene apes retain primitive features related to powerful-grasping palmigrady on the basal portion, the shaft, and the trochlea of the proximal phalanges. These features suggest that above-branch quadrupedalism, inherited from stem hominoids, constituted a significant component of the locomotor repertories of different hominoid lineages at least until the late Miocene. Nonetheless, despite their striking morphological similarities, several Miocene apes do significantly differ in phalangeal curvature and/or elongation. Hispanopithecus most clearly departs by displaying markedly-curved and elongated phalanges, similar to those in the most suspensory of the extant apes (hylobatids and orangutans). This feature agrees with several others that indicate orang-like suspensory capabilities. The remaining Miocene apes, on the contrary, display low to moderate phalangeal curvature, and short to moderately-elongated phalanges, which are indicative of the lack of suspensory adaptations. As such, the transition from a pronograde towards an orthograde body plan, as far as this particular anatomical region is concerned, is reflected only in somewhat more elongated phalanges, which may be functionally related to enhanced vertical-climbing capabilities. Our results therefore agree with the view that hominoid locomotor evolution largely took place in a mosaic fashion: just as taillessness antedated the acquisition of an orthograde body plan, the emergence of the latter--being apparently related only to vertical climbing--also preceded the acquisition of suspensory adaptations, as well as the loss of primitively-retained, palmigrady-related features.
Pierolapithecus的部分骨骼提供了最古老的确凿的正位姿势证据,再加上最近描述的最有可能属于Griphopithecus的帕萨拉尔指骨,为了解类人猿进化过程中从俯伏姿势/正位姿势转变期间手部解剖结构的变化提供了独特的机会。在本文中,我们描述了Pierolapithecus的手部指骨,并将它们的形态和比例与其他中新世猿类的进行比较,以便对运动进化做出古生物学推断。特别是,我们研究正位姿势/俯伏姿势的进化转变,以测试垂直攀爬和悬吊能力的获得在进化过程中是否相互分离。我们的结果表明,中新世猿类的手部指骨彼此之间比与现存猿类的更为相似。特别是,中新世猿类在近端指骨的基部、骨干和滑车处保留了与有力抓握的掌行姿势相关的原始特征。这些特征表明,从原始类人猿继承而来的树上四足行走,至少直到中新世晚期,都是不同类人猿谱系运动方式的重要组成部分。尽管如此,尽管它们在形态上有惊人的相似之处,但几种中新世猿类在指骨弯曲度和/或长度上确实存在显著差异。西班牙古猿表现出明显弯曲和拉长的指骨,与现存猿类中最善于悬吊的猿类(长臂猿和猩猩)的指骨相似,这是最明显的不同之处。这一特征与其他几个表明具有类似猩猩悬吊能力的特征相符。相反,其余的中新世猿类表现出低到中等程度的指骨弯曲度,以及短到中等长度的指骨,这表明它们缺乏悬吊适应性。因此,就这个特定的解剖区域而言,从俯伏姿势到正位姿势身体结构的转变,仅体现在指骨稍微变长上,这在功能上可能与增强的垂直攀爬能力有关。因此,我们的结果与以下观点一致,即类人猿的运动进化在很大程度上是以镶嵌的方式进行的:正如无尾状态早于正位姿势身体结构的获得一样,后者的出现——显然仅与垂直攀爬有关——也早于悬吊适应性的获得,以及原始保留的、与掌行姿势相关特征的丧失。