文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

颈部功能障碍指数在机械性颈部疾病患者中的反应性。

Responsiveness of the Neck Disability Index in patients with mechanical neck disorders.

作者信息

Young Brian A, Walker Michael J, Strunce Joseph B, Boyles Robert E, Whitman Julie M, Childs John D

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Sheppard AFB, TX, USA.

出版信息

Spine J. 2009 Oct;9(10):802-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Jul 25.


DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2009.06.002
PMID:19632904
Abstract

PURPOSE: Report the test-retest reliability, construct validity, minimum clinically important difference (MCID), and minimal detectable change (MDC) for the Neck Disability Index (NDI). STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Cohort study of patients presenting to outpatient physical therapy clinics. PATIENT SAMPLE: Ninety-one subjects with a primary complaint of neck pain, with or without concomitant upper extremity (UE) symptoms, who were participants in a randomized clinical trial. OUTCOME MEASURES: NDI and the 15-point Global Rating of Change (GRC) self-report measures. METHODS: All subjects completed the NDI at baseline and at a 3-week follow-up. Additionally, subjects completed the GRC scale, which was used to dichotomize patients into improved or stable groups. Changes in the NDI were used to assess test-retest reliability, construct validity, MCID, and MDC. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability was moderate for the NDI (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.84). For the NDI, the MCID was 7.5 points and the MDC was 10.2 points. CONCLUSIONS: The NDI appears to demonstrate adequate responsiveness based on statistical reference criteria when used in a sample that approximates the high percentage of patients with neck pain and concomitant UE referred symptoms. Because the MCID is within the bounds of measurement error, a 10-point change (the MDC) should be used as the MCID.

摘要

目的:报告颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)的重测信度、结构效度、最小临床重要差异(MCID)和最小可检测变化(MDC)。 研究设计/设置:对到门诊物理治疗诊所就诊的患者进行队列研究。 患者样本:91名主要主诉为颈部疼痛、有或无伴随上肢(UE)症状的受试者,他们是一项随机临床试验的参与者。 结局指标:NDI和15分的整体变化评分(GRC)自我报告测量指标。 方法:所有受试者在基线和3周随访时完成NDI。此外,受试者完成GRC量表,该量表用于将患者分为改善组或稳定组。NDI的变化用于评估重测信度、结构效度、MCID和MDC。 结果:NDI的重测信度中等(组内相关系数,0.64;95%置信区间,0.19 - 0.84)。对于NDI,MCID为7.5分,MDC为10.2分。 结论:当在接近高比例颈部疼痛且伴有UE相关症状患者的样本中使用时,根据统计参考标准,NDI似乎显示出足够的反应性。由于MCID在测量误差范围内,应将10分的变化(MDC)用作MCID。

相似文献

[1]
Responsiveness of the Neck Disability Index in patients with mechanical neck disorders.

Spine J. 2009-10

[2]
Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with mechanical neck pain.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008-1

[3]
The reliability and construct validity of the Neck Disability Index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006-3-1

[4]
Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion.

Spine J. 2010-4-1

[5]
The cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of neck disability index in patients with neck pain: a Turkish version study.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008-5-15

[6]
Minimal clinically important change of the Neck Disability Index and the Numerical Rating Scale for patients with neck pain.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007-12-15

[7]
Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the neck disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with mechanical neck pain without upper extremity symptoms.

Physiother Theory Pract. 2018-6-1

[8]
Reliability and validity of the finnish version of the neck disability index and the modified neck pain and disability scale.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010-3-1

[9]
Performance-based or self-report measures of physical function: which should be used in clinical trials of hip fracture patients?

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008-11

[10]
Responsiveness and Interpretability of the Portuguese Version of the Neck Disability Index in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain Undergoing Physiotherapy.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015-11

引用本文的文献

[1]
Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and percussion massage therapy in cervical disc herniation: a randomized controlled study.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2025-8-30

[2]
Effects of Positional Traction Integrated With Mobilization With Movement on Cervical Facet Joint Syndrome.

Cureus. 2025-7-19

[3]
Mapping evidence of spinal manipulation therapy for headaches in South Africa: a scoping review of grey literature.

BMC Complement Med Ther. 2025-8-1

[4]
Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patients with Acute Neck Pain Undergoing Conservative Treatment with Korean Medicine.

J Pain Res. 2025-7-23

[5]
Effects of Pre-Operative HbA1c on Outcomes and the Rate of Clinical Improvement Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

J Clin Med. 2025-6-28

[6]
Pain and Disability Reduction Following Rib Manipulation in a Patient Recovering from Osteomyelitis of the Thoracic Spine.

Healthcare (Basel). 2025-6-6

[7]
Results of upper cervical palpation test in migraine patients are not explained by pain sensitization.

Sci Rep. 2025-6-25

[8]
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures in Spine Surgery.

Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2025-5-17

[9]
Complexity of post-concussion syndrome assessment and management: a case for customizing rehabilitation.

Biomed Eng Online. 2025-4-25

[10]
Responsiveness and minimal important change of neck disability index and numeric pain rating scale for neck patients in the Norwegian neck and back register.

Eur Spine J. 2025-4-24

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索