芬兰版颈部残疾指数和改良颈部疼痛和残疾量表的信度和效度。

Reliability and validity of the finnish version of the neck disability index and the modified neck pain and disability scale.

机构信息

Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Central Finland Health Care District, Jyväskylä, Finland.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Mar 1;35(5):552-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b327ff.

DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b327ff

PMID:20147882

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Translation and psychometric testing.

OBJECTIVE

To cross-culturally adapt the Neck Disability Index (NDI) to the Finnish language and to assess the reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI-FI) and the modified Neck Pain and Disability Scale (mNPDS-FI) in Finnish patients with neck pain.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although largely used, no previous reports exist on the translation process or the testing of the psychometric properties of the Finnish version of the NDI or the mNPDS used in Finland.

METHODS

The translation of the questionnaire from English into Finnish was done in accordance with the published guidelines. A total of 101 patients with neck pain participated in the study. The reliability of the questionnaires was tested using a test-retest procedure at 2-week intervals. Further psychometric testing was done by assessing the construct validity and internal consistency of the questionnaires.

RESULTS

Test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients) was excellent for the NDI-FI (0.94) and mNPDS-FI (0.91). Factor analysis identified 1 factor for the NDI-FI and 3 factors for the mNPDS-FI; pain intensity, work ability, and activities of daily living. The internal consistency value (Cronbach alpha) for the NDI-FI was 0.85, and 0.84, 0.83, and 0.82, respectively, for the 3 factors of the mNPDS-FI. The correlation between neck pain and the NDI-FI was 0.58 (P < 0.001) and 0.72 for the mNPDS-FI (P < 0.001). A statistically significant linear relationship was observed between self-estimated coping and the outcomes of the NDI-FI and the mNPDS-FI.

CONCLUSION

The NDI-FI and the mNPDS-FI are reliable, valid instruments for assessing disability among Finnish patients with neck pain.

摘要

研究设计

翻译和心理计量学测试。

目的

将 Neck Disability Index（NDI）跨文化适应为芬兰语，并评估芬兰语版 Neck Disability Index（NDI-FI）和改良 Neck Pain and Disability Scale（mNPDS-FI）在芬兰颈痛患者中的可靠性和有效性。

背景数据概要

尽管大量使用，但以前没有关于芬兰语版 NDI 或芬兰使用的改良 Neck Pain and Disability Scale（mNPDS-FI）的翻译过程或心理计量学特性测试的报告。

方法

根据已发表的指南，将问卷从英语翻译成芬兰语。共有 101 名颈痛患者参加了这项研究。使用 2 周间隔的测试-重测程序测试问卷的可靠性。进一步的心理计量学测试通过评估问卷的结构有效性和内部一致性来进行。

结果

NDI-FI（0.94）和 mNPDS-FI（0.91）的测试-重测可靠性（组内相关系数）非常好。因子分析确定 NDI-FI 有 1 个因素，mNPDS-FI 有 3 个因素；疼痛强度、工作能力和日常生活活动。NDI-FI 的内部一致性值（Cronbach alpha）为 0.85，mNPDS-FI 的 3 个因素分别为 0.84、0.83 和 0.82。颈痛与 NDI-FI 的相关性为 0.58（P<0.001），mNPDS-FI 为 0.72（P<0.001）。自我估计的应对能力与 NDI-FI 和 mNPDS-FI 的结果之间存在显著的线性关系。