Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Crit Care Med. 2010 Jan;38(1):59-64. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b088ec.
Data collected from two cohorts of patients aged > or =80 yrs and admitted to an intensive care unit in France were compared to determine whether intensive care unit care and survival had evolved from the 1990s to the 2000s.
Retrospective cohort study on patient data attained during intensive care unit stays.
18-bed intensive care unit in an academic medical center.
Two cohorts of patients aged > or =80 yrs, admitted to an intensive care unit at a 10-yr interval.
None.
The first cohort comprised 348 patients admitted between January 1992 and December 1995, and the second cohort, 373 patients admitted between January 2001 and December 2004. There was no difference in age between the two cohorts, but patients in the second had significantly less history of functional limitation and significantly more acute illness (Simplified Acute Physiology Score II 43 +/- 18 vs. 57 +/- 25, respectively, p < .0001). Patients in the second cohort had a significantly higher Omega Score, had a higher occurrence of renal replacement therapy, and received vasopressors more frequently than the patients in the first cohort, even when adjusted for age, sex, Knaus classification, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, and intensive care unit admission cause. Intensive care unit mortality was 65% and 64% for the first and second cohorts, respectively. In multivariate analysis (including age, Knaus classification, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and first vs. second period) for association with intensive care unit survival, the 2001-2004 period was associated with a near tripling of chances of survival (odds ratio 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.92-4.47, p < .0001).
The characteristics and intensity of treatment for elderly people admitted to the intensive care unit changed significantly over a decade. The intensity of treatments has increased over time and survival has improved over time as well. A potential link between increased treatment and improved survival in the elderly may be evoked.
比较法国两个 80 岁以上患者队列的数据,以确定重症监护病房的护理和生存率是否从 20 世纪 90 年代发展到 21 世纪。
对重症监护病房住院患者数据进行回顾性队列研究。
学术医疗中心的 18 张病床重症监护病房。
每 10 年间隔一次入住重症监护病房的两个 80 岁以上患者队列。
无。
第一队列包括 1992 年 1 月至 1995 年 12 月期间入住的 348 名患者,第二队列包括 2001 年 1 月至 2004 年 12 月期间入住的 373 名患者。两组患者年龄无差异,但第二组患者的功能受限史明显较少,急性病明显较多(简化急性生理学评分 II 分别为 43 ± 18 与 57 ± 25,p<0.0001)。第二队列患者的 Omega 评分显著更高,需要肾脏替代治疗的发生率更高,并且接受血管加压素的频率高于第一队列患者,即使调整了年龄、性别、Knaus 分类、简化急性生理学评分 II 和重症监护病房入院原因也是如此。第一和第二队列的重症监护病房死亡率分别为 65%和 64%。在多变量分析(包括年龄、Knaus 分类、简化急性生理学评分 II 以及第一和第二时期)中,与重症监护病房生存率相关的因素中,2001-2004 年与生存率几乎增加三倍相关(比值比 2.9;95%置信区间,1.92-4.47,p<0.0001)。
十年来,入住重症监护病房的老年患者的特征和治疗强度发生了显著变化。随着时间的推移,治疗强度增加,生存率也随之提高。在老年人中,治疗增加与生存改善之间可能存在潜在联系。