• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

物理治疗干预随机对照试验的索引:AMED、CENTRAL、CINAHL、EMBASE、“证据成瘾”、PEDro、PsycINFO和PubMed的比较

Indexing of randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions: a comparison of AMED, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, hooked on evidence, PEDro, PsycINFO and PubMed.

作者信息

Moseley Anne M, Sherrington Catherine, Elkins Mark R, Herbert Robert D, Maher Christopher G

机构信息

The George Institute for International Health, The University of Sydney, PO Box M201, Missenden Road, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.

出版信息

Physiotherapy. 2009 Sep;95(3):151-6. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2009.01.006. Epub 2009 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.physio.2009.01.006
PMID:19635333
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the comprehensiveness of indexing the reports of randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions by eight bibliographic databases (AMED, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, Hooked on Evidence, PEDro, PsycINFO and PubMed).

DESIGN

Audit of bibliographic databases.

METHODS

Two hundred and eighty-one reports of randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions were identified by screening the reference lists of 30 relevant systematic reviews published in four consecutive issues of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Issue 3, 2007 to Issue 2, 2008). AMED, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, Hooked on Evidence, PEDro, PsycINFO and PubMed were used to search for the trial reports. The number of trial reports indexed in each database was calculated.

RESULTS

PEDro indexed 99% of the trial reports, CENTRAL indexed 98%, PubMed indexed 91%, EMBASE indexed 82%, CINAHL indexed 61%, Hooked on Evidence indexed 40%, AMED indexed 36% and PsycINFO indexed 17%. Most trial reports (92%) were indexed on four or more of the databases. One trial report was indexed on a single database (PEDro).

CONCLUSIONS

Of the eight bibliographic databases examined, PEDro and CENTRAL provide the most comprehensive indexing of reports of randomised trials of physiotherapy interventions.

摘要

目的

比较八个书目数据库(AMED、CENTRAL、CINAHL、EMBASE、Hooked on Evidence、PEDro、PsycINFO和PubMed)对物理治疗干预随机对照试验报告进行索引的全面性。

设计

对书目数据库的审核。

方法

通过筛选连续四期《Cochrane系统评价数据库》(2007年第3期至2008年第2期)发表的30篇相关系统评价的参考文献列表,确定了281篇物理治疗干预随机对照试验的报告。使用AMED、CENTRAL、CINAHL、EMBASE、Hooked on Evidence、PEDro、PsycINFO和PubMed搜索试验报告。计算每个数据库中索引的试验报告数量。

结果

PEDro索引了99%的试验报告,CENTRAL索引了98%,PubMed索引了91%,EMBASE索引了82%,CINAHL索引了61%,Hooked on Evidence索引了40%,AMED索引了36%,PsycINFO索引了17%。大多数试验报告(92%)在四个或更多数据库中被索引。一篇试验报告仅在一个数据库(PEDro)中被索引。

结论

在所检查的八个书目数据库中,PEDro和CENTRAL对物理治疗干预随机试验报告的索引最为全面。

相似文献

1
Indexing of randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions: a comparison of AMED, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, hooked on evidence, PEDro, PsycINFO and PubMed.物理治疗干预随机对照试验的索引:AMED、CENTRAL、CINAHL、EMBASE、“证据成瘾”、PEDro、PsycINFO和PubMed的比较
Physiotherapy. 2009 Sep;95(3):151-6. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2009.01.006. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
2
CENTRAL, PEDro, PubMed, and EMBASE are the most comprehensive databases indexing randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions.CENTRAL、PEDro、PubMed 和 EMBASE 是索引物理治疗干预措施的随机对照试验的最全面数据库。
Phys Ther. 2011 Feb;91(2):190-7. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100116. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
3
Handsearching still a valuable element of the systematic review.手工检索仍然是系统评价的一个重要组成部分。
Evid Based Dent. 2008;9(3):85. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400602.
4
The handsearching of 2 medical journals of Bahrain for reports of randomized controlled trials.对巴林的两份医学期刊进行手工检索,以查找随机对照试验报告。
Saudi Med J. 2006 Apr;27(4):526-30.
5
PEDro. A database of randomized trials and systematic reviews in physiotherapy.PEDro。一个物理治疗领域随机试验和系统评价的数据库。
Man Ther. 2000 Nov;5(4):223-6. doi: 10.1054/math.2000.0372.
6
A description of the trials, reviews, and practice guidelines indexed in the PEDro database.对PEDro数据库中索引的试验、综述和实践指南的描述。
Phys Ther. 2008 Sep;88(9):1068-77. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080002. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
7
[Handsearching for randomized controlled clinical trials in German medical journals].[在德国医学期刊中手工检索随机对照临床试验]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Feb;133(6):230-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1017501.
8
Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.Cochrane综述比非Cochrane综述采用了更严格的方法:物理治疗系统综述调查。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1021-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.09.018. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
9
Ten years of evidence to guide physiotherapy interventions: Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro).指导物理治疗干预的十年证据:物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)。
Br J Sports Med. 2010 Sep;44(12):836-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.066357. Epub 2009 Oct 20.
10
Understanding why evidence from randomised clinical trials may not be retrieved from Medline: comparison of indexed and non-indexed records.从 Medline 中可能无法检索到随机临床试验证据的原因分析:索引记录与非索引记录的比较。
BMJ. 2012 Jan 3;344:d7501. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7501.

引用本文的文献

1
Should CINAHL be used as one of the main databases for evidence synthesis of health services intervention?护理学与健康领域累积索引(CINAHL)是否应作为卫生服务干预证据综合的主要数据库之一?
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2023 Jul 12;1(5):e12019. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12019. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
The methodological quality of clinical trials of physical therapy for low back pain varies between countries with different income levels. A meta-epidemiological study.不同收入水平国家之间,针对腰痛的物理治疗临床试验的方法学质量存在差异。一项元流行病学研究。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2024 Nov-Dec;28(6):101139. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101139. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
3
Reporting of confidence intervals, achievement of intended sample size, and adjustment for multiple primary outcomes in randomised trials of physical therapy interventions: an analysis of 100 representatively sampled trials.
物理治疗干预随机试验中报告置信区间、实现预期样本量和调整多个主要结局:对 100 个具有代表性样本试验的分析。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2024 May-Jun;28(3):101079. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101079. Epub 2024 May 21.
4
The Effect of Manual Therapy Plus Exercise in Patients with Lateral Ankle Sprains: A Critically Appraised Topic with a Meta-Analysis.手法治疗加运动对踝关节外侧扭伤患者的影响:一项带有荟萃分析的严格评价主题
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 22;11(16):4925. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164925.
5
The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) has better free full-text access than PubMed: An observational study.《物理治疗证据数据库》(PEDro)比 PubMed 拥有更好的免费全文获取:一项观察性研究。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2022 Jan-Feb;26(1):100392. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100392. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
6
Generalizability of Results from Randomized Controlled Trials in Post-Stroke Physiotherapy.中风后物理治疗随机对照试验结果的可推广性
Physiother Can. 2020 Nov 1;72(4):382-393. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2018-0117.
7
Dose-response-relationship of stabilisation exercises in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-regression.慢性非特异性下腰痛患者稳定练习的剂量-反应关系:系统评价与荟萃回归。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 9;10(1):16921. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73954-9.
8
The impact of low back pain systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines measured by the Altmetric score: Cross-Sectional study.腰痛系统评价和临床实践指南对 Altmetric 分数影响的横断面研究。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2021 Jan-Feb;25(1):48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
9
A methodological survey on reporting of pilot and feasibility trials for physiotherapy interventions: a study protocol.关于物理治疗干预措施的试验和可行性试验报告方法的调查:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 22;9(5):e020580. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020580.
10
Societá Italiana de Fisioterapia and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro).意大利物理治疗协会和物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)。
Arch Physiother. 2019 Mar 14;9:5. doi: 10.1186/s40945-019-0058-3. eCollection 2019.