• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patients' preferences for treatment of hepatitis C.患者对丙型肝炎治疗的偏好。
Med Decis Making. 2010 Jan-Feb;30(1):45-57. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09341588. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
2
Pharmacological interventions for acute hepatitis C infection: an attempted network meta-analysis.急性丙型肝炎感染的药物干预:一项网状Meta分析尝试
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 13;3(3):CD011644. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011644.pub2.
3
Pilot study of pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation.聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2b与利巴韦林用于肝移植后复发性丙型肝炎的初步研究。
Transplant Proc. 2003 Dec;35(8):3042-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2003.10.083.
4
Examining Hepatitis C Virus Treatment Preference Heterogeneity Using Segmentation Analysis: Treat Now or Defer?使用细分分析研究丙型肝炎病毒治疗偏好异质性:立即治疗还是推迟治疗?
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;50(3):252-7. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000380.
5
Clinical presentation, outcome, and response to therapy among patients with acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis C.慢性丙型肝炎急性加重患者的临床表现、转归和治疗反应。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Sep;11(9):1174-1180.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.025. Epub 2013 Apr 13.
6
Interventions for dialysis patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.针对丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染的透析患者的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 19;2015(8):CD007003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007003.pub2.
7
Pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation.聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林用于肝移植后复发性丙型肝炎
Transplant Proc. 2005 Dec;37(10):4403-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.10.018.
8
HIV/Hepatitis C virus-coinfected virologic responders to pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy more frequently incur interferon-related adverse events than nonresponders do.HIV/丙型肝炎病毒合并感染的患者对聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林治疗有病毒学应答者比无应答者更常发生与干扰素相关的不良反应。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Mar;53(3):357-63. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181c7a29d.
9
Efficacy and safety of treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in renal transplant recipients.肾移植受者丙型肝炎病毒感染治疗的疗效和安全性。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jan 7;18(1):55-63. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i1.55.
10
Treatment of genotype 4 hepatitis C recurring after liver transplantation using a combination of pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin.聚乙二醇干扰素 alfa-2a 和利巴韦林联合治疗肝移植后复发的基因型 4 丙型肝炎。
Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Jun;56(6):1848-52. doi: 10.1007/s10620-010-1526-5. Epub 2011 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamics of Patient-Based Benefit-Risk Assessment of Medicines in Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.慢性病中基于患者的药物获益-风险评估动态:一项系统综述
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Sep 20;16:2609-2637. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S375062. eCollection 2022.
2
MyPref: pilot study of a novel communication and decision-making tool for adolescents and young adults with advanced cancer.我的偏好:一种新型沟通和决策工具的初步研究,适用于患有晚期癌症的青少年和年轻成人。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jun;29(6):2983-2992. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05806-1. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
3
What Matters Most for Treatment Decisions in Hepatitis C: Effectiveness, Costs, and Altruism.在丙型肝炎治疗决策中最重要的是什么:疗效、成本和利他主义。
Patient. 2019 Dec;12(6):631-638. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00378-7.
4
Direct-acting antiviral treatment for HIV/HCV patients in safety net settings: patient and provider preferences.安全网环境下针对HIV/HCV患者的直接抗病毒治疗:患者和医疗服务提供者的偏好
AIDS Care. 2019 Nov;31(11):1340-1347. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2019.1587353. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
5
The Patient-Provider Relationship Is Associated with Hepatitis C Treatment Eligibility: A Prospective Mixed-Methods Cohort Study.医患关系与丙型肝炎治疗资格相关:一项前瞻性混合方法队列研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 22;11(2):e0148596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148596. eCollection 2016.
6
Preferences for antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis C: a discrete choice experiment.慢性丙型肝炎抗病毒治疗的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Eur J Health Econ. 2017 Mar;18(2):155-165. doi: 10.1007/s10198-016-0763-8. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
7
When Patients Write the Guidelines: Patient Panel Recommendations for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.当患者制定指南时:类风湿关节炎治疗的患者小组建议
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Jan;68(1):26-35. doi: 10.1002/acr.22758. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
8
Examining Hepatitis C Virus Treatment Preference Heterogeneity Using Segmentation Analysis: Treat Now or Defer?使用细分分析研究丙型肝炎病毒治疗偏好异质性:立即治疗还是推迟治疗?
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;50(3):252-7. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000380.
9
Patient-Important Outcomes in the Long-Term Treatment of Bipolar Disorder: A Mixed-Methods Approach Investigating Relative Preferences and a Proposed Taxonomy.患者在双相情感障碍长期治疗中的重要结局:一项混合方法研究,调查相对偏好和提出分类法。
Patient. 2016 Apr;9(2):91-102. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0128-x.
10
Understanding Patients' Preferences for Referrals to Specialists for an Asymptomatic Condition.了解患者对于将无症状疾病转诊至专科医生的偏好。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Aug 1;35(6):691-702. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14566640. Epub 2015 Jan 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality-of-life tradeoffs for hepatitis C treatment: do patients and providers agree?丙型肝炎治疗的生活质量权衡:患者与医疗服务提供者意见一致吗?
Med Decis Making. 2008 Mar-Apr;28(2):233-42. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07311753. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
2
Reasons why patients infected with chronic hepatitis C virus choose to defer treatment: do they alter their decision with time?慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染患者选择推迟治疗的原因:他们的决定会随时间改变吗?
Dig Dis Sci. 2007 May;52(5):1168-76. doi: 10.1007/s10620-006-9579-1. Epub 2007 Mar 15.
3
Sustained virological response to interferon-alpha is associated with improved outcome in HCV-related cirrhosis: a retrospective study.α干扰素持续病毒学应答与丙型肝炎病毒相关肝硬化预后改善相关:一项回顾性研究。
Hepatology. 2007 Mar;45(3):579-87. doi: 10.1002/hep.21492.
4
American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the management of hepatitis C.美国胃肠病学会关于丙型肝炎管理的技术审查
Gastroenterology. 2006 Jan;130(1):231-64; quiz 214-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.010.
5
Patients' experiences related to anti-viral treatment for hepatitis C.患者与丙型肝炎抗病毒治疗相关的经历。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jul;62(1):148-55. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.019. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
6
Understanding patient preferences for HIV medications using adaptive conjoint analysis: feasibility assessment.使用适应性联合分析了解患者对艾滋病毒药物的偏好:可行性评估。
Value Health. 2005 Jul-Aug;8(4):453-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00036.x.
7
Barriers to the treatment of hepatitis C. Patient, provider, and system factors.丙型肝炎治疗的障碍。患者、医疗服务提供者及系统因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Aug;20(8):754-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0161.x.
8
Reasons for non-treatment of hepatitis C in veterans in care.接受护理的退伍军人中未治疗丙型肝炎的原因。
J Viral Hepat. 2005 Jan;12(1):81-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2005.00547.x.
9
Elevated prevalence of hepatitis C infection in users of United States veterans medical centers.美国退伍军人医疗中心使用者中丙型肝炎感染率升高。
Hepatology. 2005 Jan;41(1):88-96. doi: 10.1002/hep.20502.
10
Hepatitis C infection in transplantation.
Clin Liver Dis. 1997 Nov;1(3):663-90. doi: 10.1016/s1089-3261(05)70328-7.

患者对丙型肝炎治疗的偏好。

Patients' preferences for treatment of hepatitis C.

机构信息

VA Connecticut Healthcare System and Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2010 Jan-Feb;30(1):45-57. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09341588. Epub 2009 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X09341588
PMID:19636065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2812601/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to ascertain patient preferences for treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV).

METHODS

The authors recruited consecutive patients eligible for treatment of HCV and used adaptive conjoint analysis (ACA), a hybrid approach of conjoint analysis that uses both self-explicated ratings and pair-wise comparisons, to elicit preferences for pegylated-interferon and ribavirin. They examined the association between patient characteristics and treatment preferences using the Mann-Whitney U test and chi(2) statistic for continuous and categorical variables, respectively, and subsequently calculated adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals using logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 140 subjects completed the ACA task. The mean (+/-SD) age of the sample was 51+/-8 y; 85% were male, and 59% were white. When described as being associated with mild side effects, 67% (n = 94) of subjects preferred treatment for HCV. The percentage of subjects preferring therapy decreased to 51% (n = 72) when it was described as being associated with severe side effects. Preferences for treatment of HCV were stronger among subjects with a higher perceived risk of developing cirrhosis, more severe underlying liver disease, and worse HCV-related quality of life. Subjects having more severe disease placed greater weight on the importance of expected benefits and less on the risk of toxicity compared with those with mild or no fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Whether to choose treatment for HCV is a difficult decision for many patients. Treatment is usually recommended for those with moderate to severe liver disease, and these results demonstrate that most patients' preferences are concordant with this practice.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定患者对丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)治疗的偏好。

方法

作者招募了符合 HCV 治疗条件的连续患者,并使用适应性联合分析(ACA),这是一种联合分析的混合方法,同时使用自我解释评分和成对比较,来引出对聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林的偏好。他们使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验和卡方检验分别比较连续和分类变量,来检验患者特征与治疗偏好之间的关联,随后使用逻辑回归计算调整后的优势比和 95%置信区间。

结果

共有 140 名患者完成了 ACA 任务。样本的平均(+/-SD)年龄为 51+/-8 岁;85%为男性,59%为白人。当描述为与轻微副作用相关时,67%(n=94)的患者更喜欢 HCV 的治疗。当描述为与严重副作用相关时,选择治疗 HCV 的患者比例降至 51%(n=72)。对发展为肝硬化、更严重的基础肝病和更差的 HCV 相关生活质量的风险感知较高的患者更倾向于治疗 HCV。与轻度或无纤维化的患者相比,病情更严重的患者更看重预期获益的重要性,而对毒性的风险则不那么看重。

结论

对许多患者来说,是否选择治疗 HCV 是一个艰难的决定。对于中重度肝病患者,通常会建议进行治疗,这些结果表明,大多数患者的偏好与这种做法是一致的。