Ban Deokjin
Department of Liberal Arts(Public Health), Woosuk University, Korea.
Uisahak. 2009 Jun;18(1):91-105.
The treatise On Ancient Medicine is nowadays one of the most admired, and most studied, of those making up the Corpus Hippocraticum. But this favored position is not a ancient phenomenon, but a modern phenomenon. The treatise contributed to the establishment of the Empiric school of medicine. Empiricists seem to have written commentaries of Hippocratic works. But the attention paid to this work in antiquity was short-lived. In the second century A.D., Galen knew the work, but he did not devote a commentary to it. He almost totally ignored it and his powerful influence made the treatise drop out of sight from later antiquity to early modern times. On Ancient Medicine was not regarded as one of the major works of the Corpus Hippocraticum until in 1939, Emile Littre was a strong advocate of the view that the work was a genuine work of Hippocrates, and placed it first in his ten-volume edition of 1839-1861. Later, some scholars advocated Littre' view, but much more scholars rose against his position. Most of studies of the work motivated by the desire to answer the Hippocratic question reached conclusions that was vague. After all to conclude that Hippocrates was the author of this work would be rash.
《论古代医学》如今是构成《希波克拉底文集》的作品中最受推崇、研究最多的著作之一。但这种受青睐的地位并非古代就有的现象,而是现代才出现的。这部论著对经验主义医学流派的建立有贡献。经验主义者似乎撰写过希波克拉底著作的评注。但古代对这部作品的关注是短暂的。公元2世纪,盖伦知晓这部作品,但他没有为其撰写评注。他几乎完全忽略了它,而他的巨大影响力使得这部论著从古代晚期到近代早期都无人问津。直到1939年,《论古代医学》才被视为《希波克拉底文集》的主要著作之一,埃米尔·利特雷强烈主张这部作品是希波克拉底的真作,并在他1839年至1861年的十卷本版本中将其置于首位。后来,一些学者支持利特雷的观点,但更多学者反对他的立场。大多数受解答希波克拉底问题的愿望驱使而对这部作品进行的研究得出的结论都很模糊。毕竟断定希波克拉底是这部作品的作者是轻率的。