• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[滑坡和泥石流灾害与环境因素的关系]

[Relations of landslide and debris flow hazards to environmental factors].

作者信息

Zhang Guo-ping, Xu Jing, Bi Bao-gui

机构信息

National Meteorological Center, Beijing 100081, China.

出版信息

Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2009 Mar;20(3):653-8.

PMID:19637606
Abstract

To clarify the relations of landslide and debris flow hazards to environmental factors is of significance to the prediction and evaluation of landslide and debris flow hazards. Base on the latitudinal and longitudinal information of 18431 landslide and debris flow hazards in China, and the 1 km x 1 km grid data of elevation, elevation difference, slope, slope aspect, vegetation type, and vegetation coverage, this paper analyzed the relations of landslide and debris flow hazards in this country to above-mentioned environmental factors by the analysis method of frequency ratio. The results showed that the landslide and debris flow hazards in China more occurred in lower elevation areas of the first and second transitional zones. When the elevation difference within a 1 km x 1 km grid cell was about 300 m and the slope was around 30 degree, there was the greatest possibility of the occurrence of landslide and debris hazards. Mountain forest land and slope cropland were the two land types the hazards most easily occurred. The occurrence frequency of the hazards was the highest when the vegetation coverage was about 80%-90%.

摘要

阐明滑坡和泥石流灾害与环境因素之间的关系对于滑坡和泥石流灾害的预测和评估具有重要意义。基于中国18431处滑坡和泥石流灾害的经纬度信息,以及海拔、高差、坡度、坡向、植被类型和植被覆盖度的1km×1km网格数据,本文采用频率比分析方法分析了该国滑坡和泥石流灾害与上述环境因素之间的关系。结果表明,中国的滑坡和泥石流灾害更多发生在第一和第二过渡带的低海拔地区。当1km×1km网格单元内的高差约为300m且坡度约为30度时,发生滑坡和泥石流灾害的可能性最大。山地林地和坡耕地是最容易发生灾害的两种土地类型。当植被覆盖度约为80%-90%时,灾害的发生频率最高。

相似文献

1
[Relations of landslide and debris flow hazards to environmental factors].[滑坡和泥石流灾害与环境因素的关系]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2009 Mar;20(3):653-8.
2
Effects of land-use changes on landslides in a landslide-prone area (Ardesen, Rize, NE Turkey).土地利用变化对滑坡易发地区(土耳其东北部里泽省阿尔代森)滑坡的影响
Environ Monit Assess. 2009 Sep;156(1-4):241-55. doi: 10.1007/s10661-008-0481-5. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
3
Land use change and landslide characteristics analysis for community-based disaster mitigation.基于社区的减灾的土地利用变化和滑坡特征分析。
Environ Monit Assess. 2013 May;185(5):4125-39. doi: 10.1007/s10661-012-2855-y. Epub 2012 Sep 8.
4
Zonation of Landslide Susceptibility in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China.中国江西瑞金滑坡易发性分区
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 31;18(11):5906. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115906.
5
[Ecological risk assessment of landslide disasters based on potential loss of ecosystem services].基于生态系统服务潜在损失的滑坡灾害生态风险评估
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Oct;30(10):3553-3562. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201910.019.
6
Understanding complex slope deformation through tree-ring analyses.通过树木年轮分析了解复杂的边坡变形。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 May 15;665:1083-1094. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.195. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
7
[Research progress in post-fire debris flow].[火灾后泥石流的研究进展]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2013 Aug;24(8):2383-92.
8
Analysis on Two Typical Landslide Hazard Phenomena in The Wenchuan Earthquake by Field Investigations and Shaking Table Tests.基于现场调查与振动台试验的汶川地震中两种典型滑坡灾害现象分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Aug 6;12(8):9181-98. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120809181.
9
Evaluation of Landslide Susceptibility Based on CF-SVM in Nujiang Prefecture.基于 CF-SVM 的怒江地区滑坡易发性评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 31;19(21):14248. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114248.
10
Comparison of Random Forest Model and Frequency Ratio Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM) in Yunyang County (Chongqing, China).随机森林模型与频率比模型在渝阳区(中国重庆)滑坡易发性制图(LSM)中的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 12;17(12):4206. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124206.