• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国国民保健署戒烟服务的效果:系统评价。

The effectiveness of NHS smoking cessation services: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Social and Policy Sciences and UK Centre for Tobacco Control Studies, University of Bath, Bath, UK.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2010 Mar;32(1):71-82. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdp074. Epub 2009 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdp074
PMID:19638397
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To analyse evidence on the effectiveness of intensive NHS treatments for smoking cessation in helping smokers to quit.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies published between 1990 and 2007. Electronic databases were searched for published studies. Unpublished reports were identified from the national research register and experts.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included. They suggest that intensive NHS treatments for smoking cessation are effective in helping smokers to quit. The national evaluation found 4-week carbon monoxide monitoring validated quit rates of 53%, falling to 15% at 1 year. There is some evidence that group treatment may be more effective than one-to-one treatment, and the impact of 'buddy support' varies based on treatment type. Evidence on the effectiveness of in-patient interventions is currently very limited. Younger smokers, females, pregnant smokers and more deprived smokers appear to have lower short-term quit rates than other groups.

CONCLUSION

Further research is needed to determine the most effective models of NHS treatment for smoking cessation and the efficacy of those models with subgroups. Factors such as gender, age, socio-economic status and ethnicity appear to influence outcomes, but a current lack of diversity-specific analysis of results makes it impossible to ascertain the differential impact of intervention types on particular subpopulations.

摘要

目的

分析 NHS 强化戒烟治疗在帮助吸烟者戒烟方面的有效性证据。

方法

对 1990 年至 2007 年期间发表的研究进行系统评价。电子数据库搜索已发表的研究。从国家研究登记处和专家处确定未发表的报告。

结果

纳入 20 项研究。这些研究表明,NHS 强化戒烟治疗有助于吸烟者戒烟。国家评估发现,4 周一氧化碳监测验证的戒烟率为 53%,1 年后降至 15%。有一些证据表明,小组治疗可能比一对一治疗更有效,而“伙伴支持”的影响取决于治疗类型。目前,关于住院干预有效性的证据非常有限。年轻吸烟者、女性、孕妇和贫困程度较高的吸烟者的短期戒烟率似乎低于其他群体。

结论

需要进一步研究确定 NHS 戒烟治疗的最有效模式,以及这些模式对亚组的疗效。性别、年龄、社会经济地位和种族等因素似乎会影响结果,但目前缺乏针对特定亚人群的结果差异化分析,因此无法确定干预类型对特定亚人群的不同影响。

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of NHS smoking cessation services: a systematic review.英国国民保健署戒烟服务的效果:系统评价。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2010 Mar;32(1):71-82. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdp074. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
2
Smoking cessation medicines and e-cigarettes: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.戒烟药物和电子烟:系统评价、网络荟萃分析和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Oct;25(59):1-224. doi: 10.3310/hta25590.
3
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub7.
4
Differences in the effectiveness of individual-level smoking cessation interventions by socioeconomic status.个体层面戒烟干预措施的有效性在社会经济地位方面的差异。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 27;1(1):CD015120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015120.pub2.
5
Strategies to improve smoking cessation rates in primary care.提高初级保健中戒烟率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD011556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011556.pub2.
6
Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy.支持孕期女性戒烟的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 14;2(2):CD001055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001055.pub5.
7
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 14;9(9):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub6.
8
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.用于戒烟的电子烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 29;1(1):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub9.
9
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 8;1(1):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub8.
10
'Cut down to quit' with nicotine replacement therapies in smoking cessation: a systematic review of effectiveness and economic analysis.使用尼古丁替代疗法“减量戒烟”:有效性的系统评价与经济分析
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Feb;12(2):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-135. doi: 10.3310/hta12020.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and disparities in receiving medical advice to quit tobacco use in the US adult population.美国成年人群体中接受戒烟医疗建议的比例及差异。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 18;12:1383060. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1383060. eCollection 2024.
2
Trends and socioeconomic inequalities in the dental attendance of adult smokers in Scotland from 2009 to 2019, a repeated cross-sectional study.2009 年至 2019 年苏格兰成年吸烟者牙科就诊的趋势和社会经济不平等:一项重复的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 8;24(1):2156. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19360-6.
3
Intersectional socioeconomic disparities in continuous smoking through pregnancy among pre-pregnant smokers in Sweden between 2006 and 2016.
2006 年至 2016 年间,瑞典孕期连续吸烟的孕妇中,社会经济地位的交叉差异。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jul 6;24(1):465. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06647-0.
4
Characterising smoking and nicotine use behaviours among women of reproductive age: a 10-year population study in England.描述育龄期女性的吸烟和尼古丁使用行为:英国一项为期 10 年的人群研究。
BMC Med. 2024 Apr 18;22(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03311-4.
5
Chronic pain-mental health comorbidity and excess prevalence of health risk behaviours: a cross-sectional study.慢性疼痛-精神健康共病与健康风险行为的过度流行:一项横断面研究。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024 Apr 8;25:e15. doi: 10.1017/S1463423624000070.
6
Reintroducing face-to-face support alongside remote support to form a hybrid stop smoking service in England: a formative mixed methods evaluation.在英格兰,重新引入面对面支持和远程支持,形成混合戒烟服务:形成性混合方法评估。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 6;24(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18235-0.
7
Barriers and Facilitators to Engaging in Smoking Cessation Support Among Lung Screening Participants.参与肺癌筛查者参与戒烟支持的障碍和促进因素。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Jun 21;26(7):870-877. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad245.
8
Non-pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation: analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.非药物干预戒烟法:系统评价和荟萃分析的分析。
BMC Med. 2023 Sep 29;21(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03087-z.
9
Evaluating smoking cessation interventions in China's primary care facility networks for hypertensive patients aged 45 years and older: A retrospective cohort study.评估中国45岁及以上高血压患者基层医疗设施网络中的戒烟干预措施:一项回顾性队列研究。
Tob Induc Dis. 2023 Sep 27;21:119. doi: 10.18332/tid/169975. eCollection 2023.
10
Verifying the accuracy of self-reported smoking behavior in female volunteer soldiers.验证女性志愿兵自我报告吸烟行为的准确性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 1;13(1):3438. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29699-2.