• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者中心静脉导管和完全植入式输液港的血栓形成和感染风险。

Risk of thrombosis and infections of central venous catheters and totally implanted access ports in patients treated for cancer.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Thromb Res. 2010 Apr;125(4):318-21. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.06.008. Epub 2009 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2009.06.008
PMID:19640573
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Thrombosis and infections are well known complications of central venous catheters and totally implanted access ports. These complications lead to increased costs due to prolonged hospitalisation, increased antibiotics use and need for replacement. The objectives of the study were to document the occurrence of catheter related thrombosis and infections in patients with central venous catheters and totally implanted chest ports in cancer patients and to investigate whether factor V Leiden is a risk factor for catheter related thrombosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February 2002 and November 2004, 43 patients with central venous catheter or totally implanted access port were followed up to document the occurrence of catheter related thrombosis and infections. Patients received chemotherapy either for haematological malignancy or for solid tumours. Factor V Leiden (R506Q) was determined by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Follow-up period ended in April 2007.

RESULTS

Catheter related thrombosis occurred in 4 patients (4/43; 9.3%) with a totally implanted access port. None of the 3 patients with factor V Leiden had catheter related infection or thrombosis. Catheter related infections occurred in 15 patients: 10 patients (23.3%; 10/43) with central venous catheter and 5 patients (11.6%; 5/43) with totally implanted access ports. Time to infection was 32.5 days in the central venous catheter group compared to 88 days in the totally implanted access port group.

CONCLUSION

A higher incidence of catheter related infections was observed in patients with central venous catheters in contrast to patients with totally implanted access ports were venous thrombosis was more frequent.

摘要

简介

血栓形成和感染是中心静脉导管和完全植入式接入端口的已知并发症。这些并发症会导致住院时间延长、抗生素使用增加和需要更换,从而增加成本。本研究的目的是记录癌症患者中心静脉导管和完全植入式胸部端口相关的血栓形成和感染的发生情况,并研究因子 V 莱顿是否是导管相关血栓形成的危险因素。

材料和方法

2002 年 2 月至 2004 年 11 月,43 例中心静脉导管或完全植入式接入端口患者接受随访,以记录导管相关血栓形成和感染的发生情况。患者接受化疗,治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤或实体瘤。通过限制性片段长度多态性分析确定因子 V 莱顿(R506Q)。随访期于 2007 年 4 月结束。

结果

4 例(4/43;9.3%)完全植入式接入端口患者发生导管相关血栓形成。3 例因子 V 莱顿患者均无导管相关感染或血栓形成。15 例患者发生导管相关感染:10 例(23.3%;10/43)中心静脉导管和 5 例(11.6%;5/43)完全植入式接入端口。中心静脉导管组感染时间为 32.5 天,而完全植入式接入端口组为 88 天。

结论

与完全植入式接入端口患者相比,中心静脉导管患者的导管相关感染发生率更高,而静脉血栓形成更常见。

相似文献

1
Risk of thrombosis and infections of central venous catheters and totally implanted access ports in patients treated for cancer.癌症患者中心静脉导管和完全植入式输液港的血栓形成和感染风险。
Thromb Res. 2010 Apr;125(4):318-21. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.06.008. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
2
[Infectious and non-infectious complications of tunneled central catheters in hematologic patients].[血液学患者隧道式中心静脉导管的感染性和非感染性并发症]
Sangre (Barc). 1999 Jun;44(3):176-81.
3
Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.小儿人群中低调可植入式静脉通路端口的放射学放置
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2001 Nov-Dec;24(6):395-9. doi: 10.1007/s00270-001-0071-1. Epub 2001 Nov 8.
4
[Venous thromboembolism associated with long-term use of central venous catheters in cancer patients].[癌症患者长期使用中心静脉导管相关的静脉血栓栓塞]
Pathol Biol (Paris). 2008 Jun;56(4):211-9. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
5
[Implantable catheter systems. Experiences with 1000 patients with central venous ports].[可植入导管系统。1000例中心静脉端口患者的经验]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1996 Jan 19;121(3):47-51. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1042970.
6
Do central venous catheters have advantages over arteriovenous fistulas or grafts?中心静脉导管比动静脉内瘘或移植物有优势吗?
J Nephrol. 2006 May-Jun;19(3):265-79.
7
Externalized Groshong catheters and Hickman ports for central venous access in gynecologic oncology patients.用于妇科肿瘤患者中心静脉通路的外置式Groshong导管和Hickman端口。
Gynecol Oncol. 1993 Dec;51(3):372-6. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1993.1306.
8
A comparison of clinical outcomes with regular- and low-profile totally implanted central venous port systems.常规型与低外形全植入式中心静脉导管系统临床结局的比较。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009 Sep;32(5):975-9. doi: 10.1007/s00270-008-9477-3. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
9
Comparison of totally implanted reservoirs with external catheters as venous access devices in pediatric oncologic patients.小儿肿瘤患者中完全植入式贮器与外置导管作为静脉通路装置的比较。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1988 Aug;167(2):141-4.
10
Clinical impact of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted port catheters in patients with cancer: an open-label, randomised, two-centre trial.外周置入中心静脉导管与植入式港静脉导管在癌症患者中的临床影响:一项开放标签、随机、两中心试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jun;122(6):734-741. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.038. Epub 2019 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence of catheter-related infection in cancer patients receiving parenteral nutrition: A retrospective cohort study of French administrative claims data.接受肠外营养的癌症患者导管相关感染的发生率:一项基于法国行政索赔数据的回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 6;104(23):e42704. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042704.
2
Comparative efficacy of cetuximab combined with FOLFOX or CAPEOX in first-line treatment of RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter case-control study.西妥昔单抗联合FOLFOX或CAPEOX一线治疗RAS/BRAF野生型转移性结直肠癌的疗效比较:一项多中心病例对照研究
Anticancer Drugs. 2025 Jun 1;36(5):383-393. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000001697. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
3
Safety and Efficacy of Initiating Parenteral Nutrition at Home, Home Start PN, in Advanced Peritoneal Metastasis.
晚期腹膜转移患者在家中开始肠外营养(家庭启动肠外营养,即Home Start PN)的安全性和有效性
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 23;16(24):4272. doi: 10.3390/cancers16244272.
4
Is it feasible to prolong the flushing interval for totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs)? A systematic review and meta-analysis.延长完全植入式静脉通路装置(TIVADs)的冲洗间隔是否可行?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jan;30(1):40-50. doi: 10.1007/s10147-024-02665-2. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
5
Machine learning risk prediction model for bloodstream infections related to totally implantable venous access ports in patients with cancer.用于预测癌症患者中与完全植入式静脉通路端口相关的血流感染的机器学习风险预测模型。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Jun 22;11(8):100546. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100546. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
Safety and feasibility assessment of extending the flushing interval in totally implantable venous access port flushing during the non-treatment stage for patients with breast cancer.乳腺癌患者非治疗阶段完全植入式静脉输液港冲管间隔延长的安全性与可行性评估
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 2;12:1021488. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1021488. eCollection 2022.
7
Risk Factors of Catheter-Related Infection in Unplanned Extubation of Totally Implantable Venous-Accessportsin Tumor Patients.肿瘤患者完全植入式静脉输液港非计划性拔管中导管相关感染的危险因素
Emerg Med Int. 2022 Sep 27;2022:4235316. doi: 10.1155/2022/4235316. eCollection 2022.
8
Establishment of a Risk Prediction Model for Pulmonary Infection in Patients with Advanced Cancer.晚期癌症患者肺部感染风险预测模型的建立
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2022 May 30;2022:6149884. doi: 10.1155/2022/6149884. eCollection 2022.
9
Retrospective analysis: 5509 cases of "totally implantable venous access port systems implantation (TIVAPS) depth" assisted by digital radiography.回顾性分析:5509 例数字 X 线辅助下“完全植入式静脉输液港系统植入(TIVAPS)深度”。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Nov;407(7):3123-3132. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02573-x. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
10
Primary Thromboprophylaxis in Patients with Malignancies: Daily Practice Recommendations by the Hemostasis Working Party of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO), the Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis Research (GTH), and the Austrian Society of Hematology and Oncology (ÖGHO).恶性肿瘤患者的一级血栓预防:德国血液学和医学肿瘤学会(DGHO)止血工作组、血栓形成与止血研究学会(GTH)以及奥地利血液学和肿瘤学会(ÖGHO)的日常实践建议
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 10;13(12):2905. doi: 10.3390/cancers13122905.