Suppr超能文献

评估用作临床决策支持工具的护理专用药物信息掌上电脑数据库。

Evaluation of nursing-specific drug information PDA databases used as clinical decision support tools.

作者信息

Polen Hyla H, Clauson Kevin A, Thomson Wendy, Zapantis Antonia, Lou Jennie Q

机构信息

Nova Southeastern University, College of Pharmacy, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2009 Oct;78(10):679-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.06.003. Epub 2009 Jul 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nursing is arguably the most organizationally diverse healthcare profession. Educational backgrounds may vary, even among similarly credentialed nurses. Drug information databases used as clinical decision support tools can improve access to pharmacologic information at point-of-care when housed on personal digital assistants. They may also help address the disparity in drug information and pharmacology education between nurses.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate nursing-specific drug information database content on personal digital assistants (PDAs).

METHODS

Seven nursing-specific PDA databases were evaluated for scope (absence or presence of an answer) and completeness (three-point scale) via the use of 80 general category and 80 subspecialty drug information questions. Erroneous information was also tracked. Individual scope and completeness scores were delineated by rank order and chi square was performed to determine differences in scope and completeness scores between the databases.

RESULTS

Davis's Drug Guide for Nurses (DDGN) and Nursing Lexi-Drugs (NLD) tied for the highest scores for scope, including each answering 72.5% of the 160 evaluation questions. No significant differences existed between their scores and those earned by Nursing2008 Drug Handbook (p<0.05). The highest scores for completeness were earned by NLD with 58.1% and DDGN at 57.1%. Saunders Nursing Drug Handbook was the only database that showed a significantly lower score in completeness as compared to the other six databases (p<0.05). A 4.2% overall error rate was found among database answers.

DISCUSSION

Significant differences were found among the performances in the databases evaluated in this study for their ability to answer commonly encountered drug information issues in nursing practice. All databases contained some erroneous information and even the top performers failed to provide answers to more than one-fourth of the questions posed. The availability of accurate and timely drug information at point-of-care can play a vital role in patient management and outcomes, but current resources that are available need to be improved.

摘要

背景

护理可以说是医疗保健行业中组织多样性最强的专业。即使是具有相似资质的护士,其教育背景也可能各不相同。当个人数字助理中存有药物信息数据库并用作临床决策支持工具时,可改善即时护理时获取药理信息的途径。这些数据库还可能有助于解决护士之间在药物信息和药理学教育方面的差异。

目的

评估个人数字助理(PDA)上特定于护理专业的药物信息数据库内容。

方法

通过使用80个一般类别和80个专科药物信息问题,对七个特定于护理专业的PDA数据库进行范围(是否有答案)和完整性(三分制)评估。还对错误信息进行了跟踪。通过排名确定各个数据库的范围和完整性得分,并进行卡方检验以确定各数据库之间范围和完整性得分的差异。

结果

《戴维斯护士用药指南》(DDGN)和《护理药物词典》(NLD)在范围得分上并列最高,在160个评估问题中各回答了72.5%。它们的得分与《2008年护理用药手册》的得分之间无显著差异(p<0.05)。完整性得分最高的是NLD,为58.1%,DDGN为57.1%。《桑德斯护理用药手册》是唯一与其他六个数据库相比完整性得分显著较低的数据库(p<0.05)。在数据库答案中发现总体错误率为4.2%。

讨论

本研究评估的数据库在回答护理实践中常见药物信息问题的能力方面表现存在显著差异。所有数据库都包含一些错误信息,即使表现最佳的数据库也未能回答超过四分之一的问题。即时护理时准确及时的药物信息可用性对患者管理和治疗结果可起到至关重要的作用,但现有的资源仍需改进。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验