Duff Kevin, O'Bryant Sid E, Westervelt Holly James, Sweet Jerry J, Reynolds Cecil R, van Gorp Wilfred G, Tranel Daniel, McCaffrey Robert J
Deparment of Psychiatry, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, 1-308 MEB, Iowa City, IA 52242-1000, USA.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 May;24(3):201-7. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acp031. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
The peer-review process is an invaluable service provided by the professional community, and it provides the critical foundation for the advancement of science. However, there is remarkably little systematic guidance for individuals who wish to become part of this process. This paper, written from the perspective of reviewers and editors with varying levels of experience, provides general guidelines and advice for new reviewers in neuropsychology, as well as outlining benefits of participation in this process. It is hoped that the current information will encourage individuals at all levels to become involved in peer-reviewing for neuropsychology journals.
同行评审过程是专业群体提供的一项极有价值的服务,它为科学进步提供了关键基础。然而,对于希望参与这一过程的个人而言,系统的指导却非常少。本文从经验各异的审稿人和编辑的角度撰写,为神经心理学领域的新审稿人提供了一般指南和建议,同时概述了参与这一过程的益处。希望当前这些信息能鼓励各级人员参与神经心理学期刊的同行评审工作。