Suppr超能文献

循环等电聚焦与连续流动电泳的比较研究:分离电荷差异微小的蛋白质。

Comparative studies of recycling isoelectric focusing and continuous flow electrophoresis: separation of proteins with minor charge differences.

作者信息

Knisley K A, Rodkey L S

机构信息

Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock.

出版信息

Electrophoresis. 1990 Nov;11(11):927-31. doi: 10.1002/elps.1150111108.

Abstract

Continuous flow zone electrophoresis (CFE) and recycling isoelectric focusing (RIEF) are two of the alternative formats for fluid phase preparative isolation of biological products in liquid separation media. The McDonnell Douglas CFE system has been used for both ground-based and microgravity separations. The ground-based McDonnell Douglas CFE and RIEF were compared for the ability to resolve mixtures of proteins with known charge differences. Mixtures of 1) cytochrome c, myoglobin, and ovalbumin or 2) beta-lactoglobulin and ovalbumin were used to evaluate the resolving capabilities of CFE and RIEF. Following separation, fractions were analyzed by determining absorbance at 280 nm and by analytical isoelectric focusing (IEF) using Coomassie Brilliant Blue or silver staining to detect focused proteins. Both CFE and RIEF apparently separated the components of both mixtures into individual peaks, separated by fractions which contained little or no detectable protein. Coomassie-stained analytical IEF gels supported this finding. However, when separated proteins were analyzed by silver staining of the analytical gels, the separation of ovalbumin from beta-lactoglobulin by CFE was not complete. Ovalbumin was free of beta-lactoglobulin but beta-lactoglobulin was contaminated by trace amounts of ovalbumin. RIEF clearly separated each protein with no detectable contamination. These data demonstrate the superiority of RIEF over CFE for resolution of protein mixtures having only minor charge differences. RIEF may be more efficient due to the documented electrodissociation of noncovalent protein:protein complexes which occurs during RIEF separations.

摘要

连续流动区带电泳(CFE)和循环等电聚焦(RIEF)是在液相分离介质中对生物制品进行液相制备分离的两种替代形式。麦克唐纳·道格拉斯CFE系统已用于地面和微重力分离。对地面麦克唐纳·道格拉斯CFE和RIEF分辨已知电荷差异蛋白质混合物的能力进行了比较。使用1)细胞色素c、肌红蛋白和卵清蛋白的混合物或2)β-乳球蛋白和卵清蛋白的混合物来评估CFE和RIEF的分辨能力。分离后,通过测定280nm处的吸光度以及使用考马斯亮蓝或银染的分析等电聚焦(IEF)来检测聚焦的蛋白质,从而对各组分进行分析。CFE和RIEF显然都将两种混合物的成分分离成了单个峰,这些峰由几乎不含或不含可检测蛋白质的馏分隔开。考马斯染色的分析IEF凝胶支持了这一发现。然而,当通过分析凝胶的银染来分析分离的蛋白质时,CFE对卵清蛋白和β-乳球蛋白的分离并不完全。卵清蛋白中不含β-乳球蛋白,但β-乳球蛋白被痕量的卵清蛋白污染。RIEF能清晰地分离每种蛋白质,没有可检测到的污染。这些数据证明了在分离仅有微小电荷差异的蛋白质混合物方面,RIEF优于CFE。由于在RIEF分离过程中发生的非共价蛋白质:蛋白质复合物的记录在案的电解离,RIEF可能更高效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验