• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[紫杉烷类在乳腺癌化疗中的作用:15年后有哪些新进展?]

[The role of taxanes in breast cancer chemotherapy: what's new 15 years after?].

作者信息

Herceg Davorin, Vrbanec Damir

机构信息

Zavod za internisticku onkologiju, Klinika za onkologiju, Klinicki bolnicki centar Zagreb.

出版信息

Lijec Vjesn. 2009 May-Jun;131(5-6):133-41.

PMID:19642533
Abstract

Taxanes were established as leading drugs in chemotherapy of breast cancer. In the first line chemotherapy of advanced disease taxanes were combined with other cytostatics. Taxane-based combinations in comparison with taxanes in sequential use were observed. There was insufficient evidence to discriminate in favour of taxane-based combinations. In randomized studies several oftaxane-based combinations were tested: taxanes with anthracyclines, capecitabine and gemcitabine. There is no evidence data to prefer any taxane combination to another. Taxanes became fundamental in the adjuvant setting of node positive breast cancer patients. The results of recent meta-analysis were not influenced by the number of axillary metastases or by estrogen receptor expression. At this time there is no data to support the superiority of any particular taxane. Paclitaxel is treatment schedule dependent, because its weekly administration setting may result in better treatment outcome. Docetaxel may be more effective if given every 3 weeks rather than weekly. Targeted therapy in combination with taxanes improves survival rate in adjuvant setting as in advanced disease.

摘要

紫杉烷类药物已成为乳腺癌化疗的主要药物。在晚期疾病的一线化疗中,紫杉烷类药物与其他细胞毒性药物联合使用。观察了基于紫杉烷的联合用药与序贯使用紫杉烷的情况。没有足够的证据支持倾向于基于紫杉烷的联合用药。在随机研究中,测试了几种基于紫杉烷的联合用药:紫杉烷与蒽环类药物、卡培他滨和吉西他滨联合。没有证据表明哪种紫杉烷联合用药优于其他联合用药。紫杉烷类药物在淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者的辅助治疗中变得至关重要。近期荟萃分析的结果不受腋窝转移数量或雌激素受体表达的影响。目前没有数据支持任何一种特定紫杉烷的优越性。紫杉醇的治疗方案具有依赖性,因为其每周给药方案可能会带来更好的治疗效果。多西他赛每3周给药一次可能比每周给药更有效。在辅助治疗和晚期疾病中,靶向治疗与紫杉烷类药物联合使用可提高生存率。

相似文献

1
[The role of taxanes in breast cancer chemotherapy: what's new 15 years after?].[紫杉烷类在乳腺癌化疗中的作用:15年后有哪些新进展?]
Lijec Vjesn. 2009 May-Jun;131(5-6):133-41.
2
Taxanes alone or in combination with anthracyclines as first-line therapy of patients with metastatic breast cancer.紫杉烷类单独或与蒽环类药物联合作为转移性乳腺癌患者的一线治疗方案。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 20;26(12):1980-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.8399.
3
[Current trends in pharmacotherapy of breast cancer].[乳腺癌药物治疗的当前趋势]
Orv Hetil. 2002 Apr 7;143(14):725-30.
4
Evidence-based use of taxanes in the adjuvant setting of breast cancer. A review of randomized phase III trials.紫杉烷类药物在乳腺癌辅助治疗中的循证应用。Ⅲ期随机试验综述。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2007 Aug;33(5):474-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2007.04.006. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
5
Emerging role of taxanes in adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: the potential and the questions.紫杉烷类药物在乳腺癌辅助治疗和新辅助治疗中的新作用:潜力与问题
Surg Clin North Am. 2003 Aug;83(4):943-71. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00071-9.
6
Adjuvant taxanes: more to the story.辅助紫杉烷类药物:还有更多故事。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2010 Sep;10 Suppl 2:S41-9. doi: 10.3816/CBC.2010.s.011.
7
Optimal sequence of anthracyclines and taxanes as adjuvant breast cancer treatment.蒽环类药物和紫杉烷类药物作为辅助性乳腺癌治疗的最佳顺序
Clin Ter. 2008 Nov-Dec;159(6):453-6.
8
Taxanes in the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer, emerging consensus and unanswered questions.紫杉烷类药物在早期乳腺癌辅助治疗中的应用:新的共识与未解决的问题
Cancer Invest. 2009 Jun;27(5):489-95. doi: 10.1080/07357900802427943.
9
Taxanes as primary chemotherapy for early breast cancer: meta-analysis of randomized trials.紫杉烷类作为早期乳腺癌的一线化疗:随机试验的荟萃分析
Cancer. 2008 Jul 15;113(2):238-46. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23544.
10
Taxanes for breast cancer: an evidence-based review of randomized phase II and phase III trials.紫杉烷类用于乳腺癌治疗:基于证据的随机II期和III期试验综述
Clin Breast Cancer. 2000 Apr;1(1):32-40; discussion 41-2. doi: 10.3816/CBC.2000.n.002.