• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电动牙刷应用是区分颞下颌关节紊乱病疼痛患者与对照组的可靠且有效的测试。

Electric toothbrush application is a reliable and valid test for differentiating temporomandibular disorders pain patients from controls.

作者信息

Nixdorf Donald R, Hemmaty Azar, Look John O, Schiffman Eric L, John Mike T

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic & Biological Sciences, School of Dentistry, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Jul 30;10:94. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-94.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-10-94
PMID:19643013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2728093/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current methods for identifying patients with pain hypersensitivity are sufficiently complex to limit their widespread application in clinical settings. We assessed the reliability and validity of a simple multi-modal vibrotactile stimulus, applied using an electric toothbrush, to evaluate its potential as a screening tool for central sensitization.

METHODS

Fourteen female temporomandibular disorders (TMD) subjects with myofascial pain (RDC/TMD Ia or Ib) and arthralgia (RDC/TMD IIIa) were compared to 13 pain-free controls of matched age and gender. Vibrotactile stimulus was performed with an electric toothbrush, applied with 1 pound pressure for 30 seconds in four locations: over the lateral pole of the temporomandibular joint, masseter, temporalis, and mid-ventral surface of forearm. Pain intensity (0-10) was recorded following the stimulus at 0, 15, 30, and 60 seconds. Test-retest reliability was assessed with measurements from 8 participants, taken 2-12 hours apart. Case versus control differentiation involved comparison of area under the curve (AUC). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine cutoff AUC scores for maximum sensitivity and specificity for this multi-modal vibrotactile stimulus.

RESULTS

Test-retest reliability resulted in an ICC of 0.87 for all 4 pooled sites. ROC-determined AUC cutoff scores resulted in a sensitivity of 57% and specificity of 92% for all 4 pooled sites.

CONCLUSION

The electric toothbrush stimulus had excellent test-retest reliability. Validity of the scores was demonstrated with modest sensitivity and good specificity for differentiating TMD pain patients from controls, which are acceptable properties for a screening test.

摘要

背景

目前用于识别疼痛超敏患者的方法足够复杂,限制了它们在临床环境中的广泛应用。我们评估了一种使用电动牙刷施加的简单多模式振动触觉刺激的可靠性和有效性,以评估其作为中枢敏化筛查工具的潜力。

方法

将14名患有肌筋膜疼痛(RDC/TMD Ia或Ib)和关节痛(RDC/TMD IIIa)的女性颞下颌关节紊乱(TMD)受试者与13名年龄和性别匹配的无疼痛对照者进行比较。使用电动牙刷进行振动触觉刺激,在四个部位以1磅压力施加30秒:颞下颌关节外侧极、咬肌、颞肌和前臂腹侧中部表面。在刺激后0、15、30和60秒记录疼痛强度(0-10)。通过对8名参与者在2-12小时内进行的测量来评估重测可靠性。病例与对照的区分涉及曲线下面积(AUC)的比较。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线来确定此多模式振动触觉刺激的最大敏感性和特异性的临界AUC分数。

结果

所有4个合并部位的重测可靠性导致ICC为0.87。ROC确定的AUC临界分数导致所有4个合并部位的敏感性为57%,特异性为92%。

结论

电动牙刷刺激具有出色的重测可靠性。该分数的有效性通过区分TMD疼痛患者与对照者的适度敏感性和良好特异性得到证明,这对于筛查测试来说是可接受的特性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d885/2728093/54a34545a727/1471-2474-10-94-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d885/2728093/e2ace59dbbfd/1471-2474-10-94-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d885/2728093/54a34545a727/1471-2474-10-94-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d885/2728093/e2ace59dbbfd/1471-2474-10-94-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d885/2728093/54a34545a727/1471-2474-10-94-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Electric toothbrush application is a reliable and valid test for differentiating temporomandibular disorders pain patients from controls.电动牙刷应用是区分颞下颌关节紊乱病疼痛患者与对照组的可靠且有效的测试。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Jul 30;10:94. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-94.
2
Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group†.颞下颌关节紊乱病(DC/TMD)的诊断标准(临床与研究用):国际 RDC/TMD 联合会*和口腔颌面痛特别兴趣小组†的推荐标准。
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014 Winter;28(1):6-27. doi: 10.11607/jop.1151.
3
Reliability of clinical temporomandibular disorder diagnoses.临床颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断的可靠性
Pain. 2005 Nov;118(1-2):61-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.07.018. Epub 2005 Sep 9.
4
The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. V: methods used to establish and validate revised Axis I diagnostic algorithms.颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准。V:用于建立和验证修订后的轴I诊断算法的方法。
J Orofac Pain. 2010 Winter;24(1):63-78.
5
The reliability and validity of self-reported temporomandibular disorder pain in adolescents.青少年自我报告的颞下颌关节紊乱疼痛的可靠性和有效性。
J Orofac Pain. 2006 Spring;20(2):138-44.
6
The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. III: validity of Axis I diagnoses.颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准。III:I轴诊断的有效性。
J Orofac Pain. 2010 Winter;24(1):35-47.
7
Determination of a pressure pain threshold cut-off value for the diagnosis of temporomandibular joint arthralgia.确定压力疼痛阈值截断值以诊断颞下颌关节关节炎。
J Oral Rehabil. 2014 May;41(5):323-9. doi: 10.1111/joor.12158. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
8
The Research Diagnostic Criteria For Temporomandibular Disorders. II: reliability of Axis I diagnoses and selected clinical measures.颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准。II:I轴诊断及选定临床测量指标的可靠性
J Orofac Pain. 2010 Winter;24(1):25-34.
9
Recalibration improves inter-examiner reliability of TMD examination.重新校准可提高颞下颌关节紊乱病检查中检查者之间的可靠性。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2006 Jun;64(3):146-52. doi: 10.1080/00016350500483137.
10
Frequency of temporomandibular arthralgia among myofascial pain patients with pain on palpation of ipsilateral masseter.同侧咬肌触诊疼痛的肌筋膜疼痛患者中颞下颌关节疼痛的发生率
Cranio. 2015 Jul;33(3):206-10. doi: 10.1179/0886963414Z.00000000062. Epub 2014 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Tests for central sensitization in general practice: a Delphi study.在全科医学中进行中枢敏化检测:一项德尔菲研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Oct 19;22(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01539-0.
2
Orofacial quantitative sensory testing: Current evidence and future perspectives.口腔面感觉定量测试:当前证据和未来展望。
Eur J Pain. 2020 Sep;24(8):1425-1439. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1611. Epub 2020 Jun 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Depression and changed pain perception: hints for a central disinhibition mechanism.抑郁症与疼痛感知改变:中枢去抑制机制的线索
Pain. 2008 Nov 30;140(2):332-343. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.09.003. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
2
Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.组内相关系数:在评估评分者可靠性中的应用。
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.
3
Usefulness and limitations of quantitative sensory testing: clinical and research application in neuropathic pain states.定量感觉测试的实用性与局限性:在神经性疼痛状态中的临床及研究应用
Pain. 2007 Jun;129(3):256-259. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.03.030. Epub 2007 Apr 23.
4
Using screening tools to identify neuropathic pain.使用筛查工具来识别神经性疼痛。
Pain. 2007 Feb;127(3):199-203. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.10.034. Epub 2006 Dec 19.
5
Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values.德国神经性疼痛研究网络(DFNS)中的定量感觉测试:标准化方案及参考值
Pain. 2006 Aug;123(3):231-243. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.01.041. Epub 2006 May 11.
6
Cyclic effects on experimental pain response in women with temporomandibular disorders.颞下颌关节紊乱症女性实验性疼痛反应的周期性影响。
J Orofac Pain. 2005 Spring;19(2):133-43.
7
Quantitative assessment of experimental pain perception: multiple domains of clinical relevance.实验性疼痛感知的定量评估:临床相关的多个领域
Pain. 2005 Apr;114(3):315-319. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.01.007.
8
Management issues of neuropathic trigeminal pain from a dental perspective.从牙科角度看神经性三叉神经痛的管理问题。
J Orofac Pain. 2004 Fall;18(4):374-80.
9
The utility of clinical neurophysiological and quantitative sensory testing for trigeminal neuropathy.临床神经生理学和定量感觉测试在三叉神经病变中的应用
J Orofac Pain. 2004 Fall;18(4):355-9.
10
Psychophysical assessment of patients with posttraumatic neuropathic trigeminal pain.创伤后神经性三叉神经痛患者的心理物理学评估
J Orofac Pain. 2004 Fall;18(4):345-54.