Yazici Muharrem, Emans John
Department of Orthopaedics, Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 1;34(17):1800-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181978ec9.
Review of relevant literature including personal opinions.
To review the current researches investigating the efficacy of growing rod and thoracic expansion techniques in the treatment of congenital spine deformity of young children, and to highlight the contrasting advantages and limitations in the fusionless treatment of progressive congenital scoliosis.
Congenital scoliosis has the potential for severe spinal deformity and thoracic insufficiency syndrome (TIS). Conventional fusion treatments in children tend to shorten the spine further exacerbating trunk shortening and TIS. In the surgical treatment of congenital spinal deformities in young children, while reconstructing the spinal deformity, one should simultaneously pursue preserving the growth potential of the vertebrae, improving the volume, symmetry, and functions of the thorax, and protecting this improvement during the growth. Today, employed in the treatment of spinal deformities of young children, there are 2 deformity reconstruction methods serving these targets: Growing rod technique and vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) with or without expansion thoracostomy.
Peer-reviewed research articles and major international meeting presentations were reviewed. Methods were compared in terms of advantages and limitations.
The growing rod technique is a safe and reliable method in the treatment of congenital spine deformity of young children who present some flexibility in the anomalous segment, or when the congenital anomaly involves a vertebral segment too long for resection, or with compensating curve with structural pattern concomitant to the congenital deformity. Expansion thoracostomy and VEPTR are the appropriate choice for severe congenital spine deformity when a large amount of growth remains. Although ventilator dependence is significantly decreasing, thoracic volume and space available for the lung are increased after expansion thoracostomy and VEPTR.
Growing rod technique should be used in patients where the primary problem is at the vertebral column. If the patient has rib fusions and/or TIS has developed, in other words, if the primary problem involves the thoracic cage, expansion thoracostomy and VEPTR should be an appropriate option.
对相关文献进行综述,包括个人观点。
回顾当前关于生长棒和胸廓扩张技术治疗幼儿先天性脊柱畸形疗效的研究,并突出在进展性先天性脊柱侧凸非融合治疗中对比鲜明的优势和局限性。
先天性脊柱侧凸有导致严重脊柱畸形和胸廓发育不全综合征(TIS)的可能。儿童的传统融合治疗往往会使脊柱进一步缩短,加剧躯干缩短和TIS。在幼儿先天性脊柱畸形的外科治疗中,在重建脊柱畸形的同时,应兼顾保留椎体的生长潜能、改善胸廓的容积、对称性和功能,并在生长过程中维持这种改善。目前,用于治疗幼儿脊柱畸形的有两种畸形重建方法可实现这些目标:生长棒技术和带或不带扩张胸廓成形术的垂直可扩张人工钛肋(VEPTR)。
对同行评审的研究文章和主要国际会议报告进行综述。对方法的优势和局限性进行比较。
生长棒技术是治疗幼儿先天性脊柱畸形的一种安全可靠的方法,适用于异常节段有一定柔韧性的患儿,或先天性异常累及的椎体节段过长无法切除,或伴有与先天性畸形相关的结构性代偿曲线的患儿。当仍有大量生长潜力时,扩张胸廓成形术和VEPTR是治疗严重先天性脊柱畸形的合适选择。尽管呼吸机依赖显著减少,但扩张胸廓成形术和VEPTR术后胸廓容积和肺可用空间增加。
生长棒技术应用于主要问题在脊柱的患者。如果患者有肋骨融合和/或已发展为TIS,换句话说,如果主要问题涉及胸廓,则扩张胸廓成形术和VEPTR应是合适的选择。