• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共享决策编码系统:它们在肿瘤学领域有何不同?

Shared decision making coding systems: how do they compare in the oncology context?

机构信息

Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Feb;78(2):261-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.06.009. Epub 2009 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2009.06.009
PMID:19647966
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The current study aimed to evaluate three coding systems which have been used to assess shared decision making in oncology consultations (OPTION, Decision Support Analysis Tool (DSAT) and Decision Analysis System for Oncology (DAS-O)): (i) comparing their ability to identify competencies of shared decision making, and (ii) determining their ability to predict patient outcomes in a single data set.

METHOD

Twenty oncologists from Australia and New Zealand participated in the IBCSG Trial 33-03. The consultations of 55 women with early stage breast cancer were audio-taped, transcribed and then coded using the OPTION, DAS-O and DSAT coding systems by three different raters. Women completed the questionnaires 2 weeks and 4 months after their consultation.

RESULTS

DAS-O was strongly correlated with OPTION (r=0.73). DSAT was moderately correlated with DAS-O and OPTION (r<0.6). Decisional satisfaction and satisfaction with doctor SDM skills were significantly correlated with OPTION (r=0.39 and 0.42 respectively) and the latter variable was correlated with DAS-O (r=0.40). These relationships persisted in multiple linear regression analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

OPTION may be the most efficient and sensitive coding system for research purposes; however, DSAT appeared to document behaviours reducing decisional conflict and both DSAT and DAS-O offer more detailed feedback to doctors.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Optimal coding system will depend on research goals and training purposes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估三种已用于评估肿瘤学咨询中共同决策的编码系统(OPTION、决策支持分析工具(DSAT)和肿瘤学决策分析系统(DAS-O)):(i)比较它们识别共同决策能力的能力,以及(ii)确定它们在单个数据集预测患者结局的能力。

方法

来自澳大利亚和新西兰的 20 名肿瘤学家参与了 IBCSG 试验 33-03。对 55 名早期乳腺癌女性的咨询进行了录音、转录,然后由三名不同的评分员使用 OPTION、DAS-O 和 DSAT 编码系统进行编码。女性在咨询后 2 周和 4 个月完成问卷。

结果

DAS-O 与 OPTION 高度相关(r=0.73)。DSAT 与 DAS-O 和 OPTION 中度相关(r<0.6)。决策满意度和对医生 SDM 技能的满意度与 OPTION 显著相关(r=0.39 和 0.42 分别),后一变量与 DAS-O 相关(r=0.40)。这些关系在多元线性回归分析中仍然存在。

结论

OPTION 可能是研究目的最有效和敏感的编码系统;然而,DSAT 似乎记录了减少决策冲突的行为,DSAT 和 DAS-O 都为医生提供了更详细的反馈。

实践意义

最佳编码系统将取决于研究目标和培训目的。

相似文献

1
Shared decision making coding systems: how do they compare in the oncology context?共享决策编码系统:它们在肿瘤学领域有何不同?
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Feb;78(2):261-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.06.009. Epub 2009 Aug 3.
2
Measuring shared decision making in the consultation: a comparison of the OPTION and Informed Decision Making instruments.衡量会诊中的共同决策:OPTION 工具与知情决策工具的比较
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jan;70(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
3
The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.共同决策干预对抑郁症初级护理的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Aug;67(3):324-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.023. Epub 2007 May 16.
4
Dyadic OPTION: Measuring perceptions of shared decision-making in practice.对偶 OPTION:测量实践中共享决策的感知。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Apr;83(1):55-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.019. Epub 2010 May 26.
5
Quality of decision making is related to decision outcome for patients with cardiac arrhythmia.决策质量与心律失常患者的决策结果有关。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Apr;87(1):49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.028. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
6
Shared decision making: prostate cancer patients' appraisal of treatment alternatives and oncologists' eliciting and responding behavior, an explorative study.共同决策:前列腺癌患者对治疗方案的评估及肿瘤医生的启发与回应行为,一项探索性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Dec;85(3):e251-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 Jun 11.
7
Opportunities for the use of decision aids in primary care.在初级保健中使用决策辅助工具的机会。
Fam Med. 2009 May;41(5):350-5.
8
Seeking informed consent to cancer clinical trials; evaluating the efficacy of doctor communication skills training.寻求癌症临床试验的知情同意;评估医生沟通技能培训的效果。
Psychooncology. 2007 Jun;16(6):507-16. doi: 10.1002/pon.1095.
9
Audit and feedback using the brief Decision Support Analysis Tool (DSAT-10) to evaluate nurse-standardized patient encounters.使用简短决策支持分析工具(DSAT-10)进行审核与反馈,以评估护士标准化患者诊疗过程。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Dec;73(3):519-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.016. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
10
Measuring shared decision making processes in psychiatry: skills versus patient satisfaction.衡量精神病学中的共同决策过程:技能与患者满意度
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Jul;67(1-2):50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.01.017. Epub 2007 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2024 Apr 1;34(2):158-165. doi: 10.5737/23688076342158. eCollection 2024 Spring.
2
Decision support for breast cancer screening decisions: A single case pre-/post-test study.乳腺癌筛查决策的决策支持:一项单病例测试前/后研究。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2024 Apr 1;34(2):151-157. doi: 10.5737/23688076342151. eCollection 2024 Spring.
3
Effects and Working Mechanisms of a Multilevel Implementation Program for Applying Shared Decision-Making while Discussing Systemic Treatment in Breast Cancer.
多层面实施计划对乳腺癌系统治疗中应用共享决策的效果及作用机制
Curr Oncol. 2022 Dec 23;30(1):236-249. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30010019.
4
Effectiveness of Individual Feedback and Coaching on Shared Decision-making Consultations in Oncology Care: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.个体反馈与辅导对肿瘤护理中共同决策咨询的有效性:一项随机临床试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Apr 6;11(4):e35543. doi: 10.2196/35543.
5
Effect of a multilevel implementation programme on shared decision-making in breast cancer care.多层面实施计划对乳腺癌护理中共同决策的影响。
BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa002.
6
Communication and Shared Decision Making in the Breast Cancer Treatment Consultation: A Comparative Analysis of English- and Spanish-Speaking Patients.乳腺癌治疗咨询中的沟通与共同决策:英语和西班牙语患者的比较分析
MDM Policy Pract. 2019 Oct 28;4(2):2381468319881651. doi: 10.1177/2381468319881651. eCollection 2019 Jul-Dec.
7
Oncologist-patient-caregiver decision-making discussions in the context of advanced cancer in an Asian setting.在亚洲的晚期癌症背景下的肿瘤学家-患者-照顾者决策讨论。
Health Expect. 2020 Feb;23(1):220-228. doi: 10.1111/hex.12994. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
8
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2016 Oct 1;26(4):304-311. doi: 10.5737/23688076264304311. eCollection 2016 Fall.
9
Decision Support for a Woman Considering Continuing Extended Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer: A Case Study.一名考虑继续进行乳腺癌延长内分泌治疗的女性的决策支持:一项案例研究
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2016 Oct 1;26(4):297-303. doi: 10.5737/23688076264297303. eCollection 2016 Fall.
10
Reducing complexity of patient decision aids for community-based older adults with dementia and their caregivers: multiple case study of Decision Boxes.降低基于社区的老年痴呆症患者及其照护者的决策辅助工具的复杂性:Decision Boxes 的多个案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 9;9(5):e027727. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027727.