Suppr超能文献

“第三间隙”——是事实还是虚构?

The 'third space'--fact or fiction?

作者信息

Jacob Matthias, Chappell Daniel, Rehm Markus

机构信息

Clinic of Anaesthesiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Nussbaumstrasse 20, 80336 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2009 Jun;23(2):145-57. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2009.05.001.

Abstract

For decades, the 'third space' was looked upon as an actively consuming compartment. Therefore, perioperative fluid regimens were traditionally based on a generous replacement of this assumed primary loss, in addition to deficits due to insensible perspiration and fasting. The practical consequence was an extremely positive fluid balance in order to maintain blood volume during major surgery. Whereas the insensible perspiration and the preoperative deficits are in fact often negligible, and the third space appears to be only a fictional construct, the excess fluid most likely accumulates interstitially. Such shifting is related to a destruction of the endothelial glycocalyx, a key structure of the vascular barrier, by traumatic inflammation and iatrogenic hypervolaemia. This explains why patients undergoing major surgical interventions benefit significantly from an infusion regimen which does not substitute but avoids 'third-space shifting'. In summary, eradicating this notion from our minds could be a further key to achieving perioperative fluid optimisation.

摘要

几十年来,“第三间隙”被视为一个积极消耗的腔隙。因此,传统的围手术期液体治疗方案除了补充因不显性出汗和禁食导致的液体缺失外,还基于对这种假定的主要液体丢失进行大量补充。实际结果是为了在大手术期间维持血容量而出现极度正性的液体平衡。然而,事实上不显性出汗和术前液体缺失往往可以忽略不计,而且第三间隙似乎只是一个虚构的概念,多余的液体很可能在间质中积聚。这种液体转移与创伤性炎症和医源性高血容量导致的血管屏障关键结构——内皮糖萼的破坏有关。这就解释了为什么接受重大外科手术的患者从一种不进行替代而是避免“第三间隙转移”的输液方案中能显著获益。总之,从我们的观念中根除这个概念可能是实现围手术期液体优化的又一关键。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验