Kaushik Jyotika
NALSAR University of Law, Shameerpet, R.R. District, Hyderabad 500078, India.
Indian J Med Ethics. 2009 Jul-Sep;6(3):149-52. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2009.047.
This paper examines the "opt out" system of organ donation wherein the State permits removal of tissue and organs posthumously unless an express objection is made by the person prior to the death. This paper examines the need for "presumed consent" and the jurisprudential arguments in support of it. The social contract theory and the sociological approach based on the principle of "common good" support this system. However, the ethical concerns raised while implementing such a system are debatable. It is for societies to evaluate the situation and make a choice between "ethics"and "common good". The answer may not be obvious in a country like India where religion may supersede the question of life and death. The paper critically assesses both the issues, and concludes that presumed consent may be a viable method of addressing the organ shortage in India. However, we need public discourse and public awareness to change people's attitude to this concept.
本文探讨了器官捐赠的“选择退出”系统,即国家允许在人死后移除组织和器官,除非该人在死前明确表示反对。本文研究了“推定同意”的必要性以及支持该制度的法理依据。基于“共同利益”原则的社会契约理论和社会学方法支持这一制度。然而,实施这一制度时引发的伦理问题存在争议。应由社会来评估这种情况,并在“伦理”和“共同利益”之间做出选择。在像印度这样宗教可能凌驾于生死问题之上的国家,答案可能并不明显。本文对这两个问题进行了批判性评估,并得出结论,推定同意可能是解决印度器官短缺问题的一种可行方法。然而,我们需要公众讨论和公众意识来改变人们对这一概念的态度。