Improved prediction of outcome by contrast echocardiography determined left ventricular remodelling parameters compared to unenhanced echocardiography in patients following acute myocardial infarction.

AIMS

Contrast echocardiography has been shown to be a more accurate method of assessing left ventricular (LV) remodelling compared with unenhanced echocardiography after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, whether this translated into improved prediction of outcome is not known.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Accordingly, a total of 89 consecutive patients undergoing contrast echocardiography and unenhanced echocardiography 7 to 10 days after AMI and reperfusion therapy were followed up for cardiac death (CD) and AMI. LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-systolic volume (ESV), and LV end-diastolic volume were assessed by the two methods independently. Outcome data were obtained (mean 46 +/- 16 months).There were 15 (17%) events (eight CDs and seven AMIs). LVEF and ESV with contrast echocardiography were found to be independent multivariable predictors of CD (P = 0.04 and P = 0.02, respectively) and CD or AMI (P = 0.02 and P = 0.01, respectively). Furthermore, LVEF and ESV with contrast echocardiography provided incremental information for the prediction of CD (P = 0.004 and P = 0.004, respectively) and CD or AMI (P = 0.02 and P = 0.03, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Contrast echocardiography provided improved prediction of outcome compared with unenhanced echocardiography following AMI.