Suppr超能文献

实现平等:理解和消除普通及骨科医疗保健差异的策略

Getting to equal: strategies to understand and eliminate general and orthopaedic healthcare disparities.

作者信息

Dykes Daryll C, White Augustus A

机构信息

Twin Cities Spine Center, Minneapolis, MN 55404, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Oct;467(10):2598-605. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0993-5. Epub 2009 Aug 5.

Abstract

The 2001 Institute of Medicine report entitled Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care pointed out extensive healthcare disparities in the United States even when controlling for disease severity, socioeconomic status, education, and access. The literature identifies several groups of Americans who receive disparate healthcare: ethnic minorities, women, children, the elderly, the handicapped, the poor, prisoners, lesbians, gays, and the transgender population. Disparate healthcare represents an enormous current challenge with substantial moral, ethical, political, public health, public policy, and economic implications, all of which are likely to worsen over the next several decades without immediate and comprehensive action. A review of recent literature reveals over 100 general and specific suggestions and solutions to eliminate healthcare disparities. While healthcare disparities have roots in multiple sources, racial stereotypes and biases remain a major contributing factor and are prototypical of biases based on age, physical handicap, socioeconomic status, religion, sexual orientation or other differences. Given that such disparities have a strong basis in racial biases, and that the principles of racism are similar to those of other "isms", we summarize the current state of healthcare disparities, the goals of their eradication, and the various potential solutions from a conceptual model of racism affecting patients (internalized racism), caregivers (personally mediated racism), and society (institutionalized racism).

摘要

2001年医学研究所发布的题为《不平等待遇:应对医疗保健中的种族和族裔差异》的报告指出,即便在控制疾病严重程度、社会经济地位、教育程度和医疗可及性等因素的情况下,美国的医疗保健差异依然广泛存在。文献表明,有几类美国人群体在医疗保健方面受到差别对待:少数族裔、女性、儿童、老年人、残疾人、穷人、囚犯、女同性恋者、男同性恋者以及跨性别者群体。差别化的医疗保健是当前一项巨大的挑战,具有重大的道德、伦理、政治、公共卫生、公共政策和经济影响。如果不立即采取全面行动,所有这些影响在未来几十年内都可能恶化。对近期文献的综述揭示了100多条消除医疗保健差异的一般性和具体建议及解决方案。虽然医疗保健差异源于多种因素,但种族刻板印象和偏见仍然是一个主要促成因素,并且是基于年龄、身体残疾、社会经济地位、宗教、性取向或其他差异的偏见的典型代表。鉴于此类差异在很大程度上基于种族偏见,且种族主义原则与其他“主义”的原则相似,我们从影响患者(内化种族主义)、医护人员(个人介导的种族主义)和社会(制度化种族主义)的种族主义概念模型出发,总结了医疗保健差异的现状、消除差异的目标以及各种可能的解决方案。

相似文献

5
Defining racial and ethnic disparities in pain management.定义疼痛管理中的种族和民族差异。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jul;469(7):1859-70. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1770-9.
10
Eradicating Racism: An Endocrine Society Policy Perspective.消除种族主义:内分泌学会的政策视角
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Apr 19;107(5):1205-1215. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab896.

引用本文的文献

2
A critical view: Examining disparities regarding timely cholecystectomy.批判视角:胆囊切除术及时性差异研究
Surgery. 2024 Nov;176(5):1345-1351. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.07.021. Epub 2024 Aug 31.

本文引用的文献

6
The public health approach to eliminating disparities in health.消除健康差距的公共卫生方法。
Am J Public Health. 2008 Sep;98(9 Suppl):S8-11. doi: 10.2105/ajph.98.supplement_1.s8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验