Bijur Polly, Bérard Anick, Esses David, Calderon Yvette, Gallagher E John
Department of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx, NY, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Jul;15(7):589-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00149.x.
The objective was to test the hypothesis that African American and Hispanic patients are less likely to receive analgesics than white patients in two academic urban emergency departments (EDs).
This was a prospective observational study of a convenience sample of patients with long-bone fractures from April 2002 to November 2006 in two academic urban EDs. Eligibility criteria were age 18-55 years, isolated long-bone fracture, and race and ethnicity (Hispanic, African American, and white). The primary outcome was receipt of analgesics; secondary outcomes included receipt of opioids, dose, route, time to first analgesic, and change in pain. Logistic regression was used to adjust the risk of receiving analgesics for patients' initial rating of pain and demographic characteristics.
Of 1,239 patients with suspected long-bone fractures, 345 patients were eligible: 177 (51%) were Hispanic, 98 (28%) were African American, and 70 (20%) were white. Administration of analgesics was not associated with race or ethnicity. Sixteen percent (95% confidence interval [CI] = 11% to 22%) of Hispanic, 15% (95% CI = 10% to 24%) of African American, and 14% (95% CI = 8% to 24%) of white patients did not receive any analgesics. Seventy-four percent of Hispanic (95% CI = 67% to 80%), 66% of African American (95% CI = 57% to 75%), and 69% (95% CI = 57% to 78%) of white patients received opioid analgesics. After adjustment for covariates, there was no evidence of an association between receipt of analgesics or opioid analgesics and the race or ethnicity of the patients. There were no significant differences in time to treatment, dose, route, or change in pain.
Receipt of analgesics for pain from long-bone fractures was not associated with patient race or ethnicity in two academic urban EDs.
本研究旨在验证以下假设:在两家城市学术性急诊科中,非裔美国患者和西班牙裔患者比白人患者更不易获得镇痛药。
这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,对2002年4月至2006年11月期间来自两家城市学术性急诊科的长骨骨折患者便利样本进行研究。纳入标准为年龄18 - 55岁、孤立性长骨骨折以及种族和族裔(西班牙裔、非裔美国人和白人)。主要结局是是否获得镇痛药;次要结局包括是否接受阿片类药物、剂量、给药途径、首次使用镇痛药的时间以及疼痛变化。采用逻辑回归分析来调整患者初始疼痛评分和人口统计学特征对获得镇痛药的风险影响。
在1239例疑似长骨骨折患者中,345例符合条件:177例(51%)为西班牙裔,98例(28%)为非裔美国人,70例(20%)为白人。镇痛药的使用与种族或族裔无关。16%(95%置信区间[CI]=11%至22%)的西班牙裔患者、15%(95%CI = 10%至24%)的非裔美国患者和14%(95%CI = 8%至24%)的白人患者未接受任何镇痛药。74%的西班牙裔患者(95%CI = 67%至80%)、66%的非裔美国患者(95%CI = 57%至75%)和69%(95%CI = 57%至78%)的白人患者接受了阿片类镇痛药。在对协变量进行调整后,没有证据表明获得镇痛药或阿片类镇痛药与患者的种族或族裔之间存在关联。在治疗时间、剂量、给药途径或疼痛变化方面没有显著差异。
在两家城市学术性急诊科中,长骨骨折疼痛患者获得镇痛药的情况与患者种族或族裔无关。