Stevens Suzanne E, Kumsta Robert, Kreppner Jana M, Brookes Keeley J, Rutter Michael, Sonuga-Barke Edmund J S
MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2009 Sep 5;150B(6):753-61. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.31010.
Early institutional deprivation is a risk factor for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms. However not all individuals are affected. We tested the hypothesis that this heterogeneity is influenced by gene x environment (GxE) interaction and that genetic polymorphisms involved in dopamine neurotransmission moderate the effects of severe early institutional deprivation on symptoms of ADHD (sADHD). Using a prospective-longitudinal design sADHD were measured at ages 6, 11, and 15 years in a sample of individuals who experienced severe institutional deprivation (up to 42 months of age) in Romanian orphanages and a non-institutionalized comparison group. Individuals were genotyped for polymorphisms in the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4 48-bp VNTR in exon 3) and dopamine transporter gene (DAT1 haplotypes combining a 40-bp VNTR in 3'UTR and a 30-bp VNTR in intron 8). The risk for sADHD associated with early institutional deprivation was moderated by the DAT1 but not the DRD4 genotypes; an effect that was first apparent in early-, and persisted to mid-adolescence. The results (i) provide evidence for developmental continuities in G x E interaction, (ii) explain some of the heterogeneity in ADHD outcomes following institutional deprivation and, (iii) add to our understanding of environmental determinants of sADHD.
早期机构剥夺是注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)症状的一个风险因素。然而,并非所有个体都会受到影响。我们检验了这样一个假设,即这种异质性受基因×环境(GxE)相互作用的影响,并且参与多巴胺神经传递的基因多态性会调节严重早期机构剥夺对ADHD症状(sADHD)的影响。采用前瞻性纵向设计,对在罗马尼亚孤儿院经历过严重机构剥夺(长达42个月)的个体样本以及一个非机构化对照组的个体,在6岁、11岁和15岁时测量sADHD。对个体进行多巴胺D4受体(DRD4外显子3中的48-bp VNTR)和多巴胺转运体基因(DAT1单倍型,结合3'UTR中的40-bp VNTR和内含子8中的30-bp VNTR)多态性的基因分型。与早期机构剥夺相关的sADHD风险受DAT1基因型而非DRD4基因型的调节;这种效应在青春期早期首次显现,并持续到青春期中期。这些结果(i)为GxE相互作用中的发育连续性提供了证据,(ii)解释了机构剥夺后ADHD结果中的一些异质性,以及(iii)增进了我们对sADHD环境决定因素的理解。