Clinical Pharmacology, Geneva University Hospitals, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland.
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Oct;23(5):543-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2009.00724.x. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
The poor oral bioavailability of the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (NA) when compared with naltrexone (NX) may be related to a greater interaction of naloxone with the efflux drug transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp). We studied the involvement of P-gp in the transepithelial transport of the two opioid receptor antagonists, using a validated human in vitro Caco-2 cell monolayer model. The bidirectional transport of NA and NX (1, 50 and 100 microm) across the monolayers was investigated in the presence and absence of the specific P-gp inhibitor GF120918 (4 microm). NA and NX showed equal transport rates between the apical-to-basolateral (A-B) and the basolateral-to-apical (B-A) directions and neither the influx nor the efflux transport was affected by the P-gp inhibitor (P > 0.05). In conclusion, NA and NX are not P-gp substrates. The differential oral bioavailability of the two opioid antagonists is P-gp independent.
与纳曲酮 (NX) 相比,阿片受体拮抗剂纳洛酮 (NA) 的口服生物利用度较差,这可能与纳洛酮与外排药物转运蛋白 P-糖蛋白 (P-gp) 的相互作用更大有关。我们使用经过验证的人体外 Caco-2 细胞单层模型研究了 P-gp 在这两种阿片受体拮抗剂的跨上皮转运中的作用。在存在和不存在特异性 P-gp 抑制剂 GF120918(4 µm)的情况下,研究了 NA 和 NX(1、50 和 100 µm)在单层中的双向转运。NA 和 NX 在从顶侧向基底侧 (A-B) 和从基底侧向顶侧 (B-A) 的方向上表现出相等的转运速率,并且 P-gp 抑制剂对流入和流出转运均无影响 (P > 0.05)。总之,NA 和 NX 不是 P-gp 的底物。这两种阿片受体拮抗剂的口服生物利用度差异与 P-gp 无关。